Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043611›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Deep-learning approach for automated thickness measurement of epithelial tissue and scab using optical coherence tomography.

Yubo Ji, Shufan Yang, Kanheng Zhou, Holly R Rocliffe, Antonella Pellicoro, Jenna L Cash, Ruikang Wang, Chunhui Li, Zhihong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yubo JiUniversity of Dundee, School of Science and Engineering, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Shufan YangEdinburgh Napier University, School of Computing, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Kanheng ZhouUniversity of Dundee, School of Science and Engineering, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Holly R RocliffeThe University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, MRC Centre for Inflammation Res, United Kingdom.
Antonella PellicoroThe University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, MRC Centre for Inflammation Res, United Kingdom.
Jenna L CashThe University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, MRC Centre for Inflammation Res, United Kingdom.
Ruikang WangUniversity of Washington, Department of Bioengineering, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Chunhui LiUniversity of Dundee, School of Science and Engineering, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Zhihong HuangUniversity of Dundee, School of Science and Engineering, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 202581/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceIn order to elucidate therapeutic treatment to accelerate wound healing, it is crucial to understand the process underlying skin wound healing, especially re-epithelialization. Epidermis and scab detection is of importance in the wound healing process as their thickness is a vital indicator to judge whether the re-epithelialization process is normal or not. Since optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a real-time and non-invasive imaging technique that can perform a cross-sectional evaluation of tissue microstructure, it is an ideal imaging modality to monitor the thickness change of epidermal and scab tissues during wound healing processes in micron-level resolution. Traditional segmentation on epidermal and scab regions was performed manually, which is time-consuming and impractical in real time.

aimWe aim to develop a deep-learning-based skin layer segmentation method for automated quantitative assessment of the thickness of in vivo epidermis and scab tissues during a time course of healing within a rodent model. APPROACH: Five convolution neural networks were trained using manually labeled epidermis and scab regions segmentation from 1000 OCT B-scan images (assisted by its corresponding angiographic information). The segmentation performance of five segmentation architectures was compared qualitatively and quantitatively for validation set.

resultsOur results show higher accuracy and higher speed of the calculated thickness compared with human experts. The U-Net architecture represents a better performance than other deep neural network architectures with 0.894 at F1-score, 0.875 at mean intersection over union, 0.933 at Dice similarity coefficient, and 18.28  μm at an average symmetric surface distance. Furthermore, our algorithm is able to provide abundant quantitative parameters of the wound based on its corresponding thickness maps in different healing phases. Among them, normalized epidermal thickness is recommended as an essential hallmark to describe the re-epithelialization process of the rodent model.

conclusionsThe automatic segmentation and thickness measurements within different phases of wound healing data demonstrates that our pipeline provides a robust, quantitative, and accurate method for serving as a standard model for further research into effect of external pharmacological and physical factors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomography, Optical CoherenceCross-Sectional StudiesEpidermisNeural Networks, Computerdeep-learning networkepidermisoptical coherence tomographyre-epithelializationscabwound healing

Identifiers

PMID35043611
PMCPMC8765552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.