Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043486›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

The precautionary principle and dietary DNA metabarcoding: Commonly used abundance thresholds change ecological interpretation.

Bethan L Littleford-Colquhoun, Patrick T Freeman, Violet I Sackett, Camille V Tulloss, Lauren M McGarvey, Chris Geremia, Tyler R Kartzinel

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Seasonal Diet Variation in Reintroduced Milu (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The apportionment of dietary diversity in wildlife.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. VTAM: A robust pipeline for validating metabarcoding data using controls.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bethan L Littleford-ColquhounDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2594-0061
Patrick T FreemanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Violet I SackettDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2216-0764
Camille V TullossDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Lauren M McGarveyYellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Mammoth Hot Springs, Wyoming, USA.
Chris GeremiaYellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Mammoth Hot Springs, Wyoming, USA.
Tyler R KartzinelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8488-0580

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary DNA metabarcoding enables researchers to identify and characterize trophic interactions with a high degree of taxonomic precision. It is also sensitive to sources of bias and contamination in the field and laboratory. One of the earliest and most common strategies for dealing with such sensitivities has been to remove all low-abundance sequences and conduct ecological analyses based on the presence or absence of food taxa. Although this step is now often perceived to be necessary, evidence of its sufficiency is lacking and more attention to the risk of introducing other errors is needed. Using computer simulations, we demonstrate that common strategies to remove low-abundance sequences can erroneously eliminate true dietary sequences in ways that impact downstream inferences. Using real data from well-studied wildlife populations in Yellowstone National Park, we further show how these strategies can markedly alter the composition of dietary profiles in ways that scale-up to obscure ecological interpretations about dietary generalism, specialism, and composition. Although the practice of removing low-abundance sequences may continue to be a useful strategy to address research questions that focus on a subset of relatively abundant foods, its continued widespread use risks generating misleading perceptions about the structure of trophic networks. Researchers working with dietary DNA metabarcoding data-or similar data such as environmental DNA, microbiomes, or pathobiomes-should be aware of drawbacks and consider alternative bioinformatic, experimental, and statistical solutions.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsAnimals, WildDietDNADNADNA, Environmentalbighorn sheepbisonfrequency of occurrencegrazer-browser continuumherbivoreHill numbersmicrohistologyrelative read abundance

Identifiers

PMID35043486
PMCPMC9303378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.