Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043382›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2022

Comprehensive diagnosis of parasites in sheep kept under different zootechnical management in a region temperate in Mexico.

P M C Acevedo-Ramírez, A L García-Soria, R Úlloa-Arvizú, I Cruz Mendoza, H Quiroz-Romero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P M C Acevedo-RamírezFacultad de Ciencias, Colonia Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, Alcaldía. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, C.P. 04510, México. perlaacevedoram@gmail.com.
A L García-SoriaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México.
R Úlloa-ArvizúFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
I Cruz MendozaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
H Quiroz-RomeroFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites cause losses in animal production. Parasite infection in ruminants has been estimated to be a major problem causing more than 3 billion USD per year, from which 60% corresponds to the sheep industry. Treatment is based on the use of synthetic anthelmintics; however, repeated application or under dosage have resulted in the selection of nematodes resistant to anthelmintics. The objective of the present work was to perform a diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep kept under different zootechnical management. Ninety female sheep were used, most of them pregnant. Sampling was performed monthly from December 2015 to June 2016 (flock 5 until April). Fecal samples were collected from the rectum; the McMaster technique was performed, morphological characteristics were observed, oocysts and eggs were counted per gram of feces (opg and epg), frequency and intensity were obtained. Faecal culture was performed for feces that had a positive result, infective larvae were obtained and taxonomically identified. At the end of the study, a dewormer (fenbendazole) was administered and its effect was measured. The frequency of gastrointestinal parasites was 100%. The highest opg was 3,600 (flock 3, March, 2016), the epg for cestodes was 2800 (flock 1, January, 2016) and for gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) was 25,000 (flock 1, May, 2016); the intensity was variable and it was increased by peripartum. Protists (Eimeria spp), cestodes (Moniezia) and nematodes (Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Chabertia ovina. Teladorsagia, Oesophagostomum, Nematodirus and Trichuris ovis) were identified. No previous diagnosis is performed in flocks, and sometimes dewormers are administered, even though resistance to ivermectin and benzimidazole is suspected. Flock management, its feeding system and its conditions were determinant for the observed results; therefore, it is necessary to count with a diagnosis that provides information about the parasitic population and its dynamic, in order to carry out a selective and comprehensive control that has an impact on the animal, human and environmental health.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticNematodaNematode InfectionsParasitesSheep DiseasesAnimalsFecesFemaleMexicoParasite Egg CountPregnancySheepAnthelminticsControlDiagnosisParasitesResistance

Identifiers

PMID35043382
OpenAlexW4206697645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.