Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043293›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2022

Outlook on next-generation probiotics from the human gut.

Francesca De Filippis, Alessia Esposito, Danilo Ercolini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Human microbiome acquisition and transmission.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mediators of inflammation · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca De FilippisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alessia EspositoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Danilo ErcoliniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. ercolini@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2884

Funding

European Commission 818368Ministero della Salute GR-2016-02362975Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 20174FHBWR_005Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca CUP E65F21003630003Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca DOT1718749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics currently available on the market generally belong to a narrow range of microbial species. However, recent studies about the importance of the gut microbial commensals on human health highlighted that the gut microbiome is an unexplored reservoir of potentially beneficial microbes. For this reason, academic and industrial research is focused on identifying and testing novel microbial strains of gut origin for the development of next-generation probiotics. Although several of these are promising for the prevention and treatment of many chronic diseases, studies on human subjects are still scarce and approval from regulatory agencies is, therefore, rare. In addition, some issues need to be overcome before implementing their wide application on the market, such as the best methods for cultivation and storage of these oxygen-sensitive taxa. This review summarizes the most recent evidence related to NGPs and provides an outlook to the main issues that still limit their wide employment.

Indexed as

AkkermansiaBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaDysbiosisEubacterialesFaecalibacterium prausnitziiGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPrevotellaProbioticsAkkermansia muciniphilaFaecalibacterium prausnitziiGut microbiomeLive biotherapeuticsNext-generation probioticsPrevotella copri

Identifiers

PMID35043293
PMCPMC11073307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.