ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022
Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of acute mesenteric ischaemia in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia secondary to diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient receiving olanzapine: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes following surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective cohort analysis : Word count: 2471.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of inflammatory ratios and nutritional scores in acute mesenteric ischemia: A retrospective single-center study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Interventional Radiology in Treating Acute Mesenteric Arterial Occlusion: A Narrative Review.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025Review
- Revascularization Strategies for Acute and Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Computed Tomography-Defined Body Composition as Prognostic Parameter in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.Digestive surgery · 2023Article
- [There is still room for improvement-On acute mesenteric ischemia].Gefasschirurgie : Zeitschrift fur vaskulare und endovaskulare Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie unter Mitarbeit der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an uncommon, but life-threatening clinical entity due to late diagnosis resulting in irreversible ischemic bowel necrosis. The most common causes of AMI are the embolic occlusion and the acute thrombosis of the mesenteric circulation. Typical treatment is composed of an early revascularization of the mesenteric circulation followed by abdominal surgery for resection of nonviable intestine and restoration of the intestinal continuity, but the mortality rates remain high.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, aiming to evaluate clinical characteristics, performed surgical procedures and outcomes of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia who underwent emergency abdominal surgery at a high volume surgical center in Germany.
resultsOverall, 53 patients were identified with the intraoperatively proven diagnosis of AMI. Overall hospital mortality was with 62% comparable to the literature. Nineteen patients presented with an intraoperatively verified complete and non-reversible intestinal infarction without any angiographic or surgical option for a revascularization of the mesenteric circulation or an option for intestinal resection. From the rest of the patients, 14 underwent intestinal resection of the ischemic area without restoration of intestinal continuity; the other 20 underwent resection with a primary anastomosis to restore intestinal continuity. The mortality rate of these patients with curative-intended surgery remained high (41% of patients died). Pre- and postoperative hyperlactatemia were associated with lower survival of these patients.
conclusionAMI remains a life-threatening abdominal emergency. Therapeutic approaches are highly depended on acting surgeon's decision, being affected by subjectively rated bowel viability and physical condition of the affected patient. Only selected patients with good bowel viability appear to be suitable for receiving primary anastomosis. The results clearly indicate the need for further research to develop therapeutic approaches for a better management of AMI and to improve outcome of affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.