Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043236›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2022

Incorporation of TILs in daily breast cancer care: how much evidence can we bear?

Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm, Grace Callagy, Marcelo Balancin, John M S Bartlett, Christos Sotiriou, Caterina Marchio, Marleen Kok, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, Roberto Salgado

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting low-risk triple-negative breast cancer: a review on de-escalation strategies for a new era.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne-Vibeke LaenkholmDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Grace CallagyDiscipline of Pathology, NUI Galway, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, Galway, Ireland.
Marcelo BalancinDepartment of Pathology, University of São Paulo Medical School (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
John M S BartlettCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christos SotiriouMedical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Caterina MarchioDivision of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Marleen KokDepartments of Medical Oncology and Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carlos Henrique Dos AnjosOncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Roberto SalgadoDepartment of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium. roberto@salgado.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1110-3801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most important developments in the breast cancer field has been an improved understanding of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, of which TILs are increasingly gaining importance. The evaluation of TILs by light microscopy on a H&E-stained section is workable in a daily practice setting. Reproducibility of reporting TILs is good, but heterogeneity is a cause of variation. TILs provide clinicians with important prognostic information for patients with TNBC, as early-stage TNBC with high TILs have > 98% 5-year survival and TILs predict benefit to immunotherapy. Importantly, while TILs do not have level of evidence IA, TILs should be used as a prognostic factor with caution and with other accepted prognostic variables, such as tumour size and lymph node status, to inform clinicians and patients on their treatment options. A framework on how to use the TILs in daily practice is proposed, including a co-assessment with PD-L1 for its predictive role to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingReproducibility of ResultsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerImmunotherapyPrognosisTILs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.