Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043104›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

Multinational primary health care experiences from the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis.

Melina K Taylor, Karen Kinder, Joe George, Andrew Bazemore, Cristina Mannie, Robert Phillips, Stefan Strydom, Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Melina K TaylorAmerican Board of Family Medicine, 1648 McGrathiana Parkway Suite 550, Lexington, KY, 40511, USA.
Karen KinderTechnische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Straße des 17, Juni 135, H80, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
Joe GeorgeCenter for Professionalism & Value in Health Care, 1016 16th St NW, Suite 700, Washington DC, 20036, USA.
Andrew BazemoreAmerican Board of Family Medicine, 1648 McGrathiana Parkway Suite 550, Lexington, KY, 40511, USA.
Cristina MannieMast Analytics, 4th Floor, Sunclare Building, 21 Dreyer Street, Claremont, 7708, South Africa.
Robert PhillipsCenter for Professionalism & Value in Health Care, 1016 16th St NW, Suite 700, Washington DC, 20036, USA.
Stefan StrydomMast Analytics, 4th Floor, Sunclare Building, 21 Dreyer Street, Claremont, 7708, South Africa.
Felicity Goodyear-SmithDepartment of General Practice & Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Room 3018, Building B507 Grafton Campus, 22-30 Park Ave, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZAmerican Academy of Family Physicians · USTechnische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo learn from primary health care experts' experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic across countries.

methodsWe applied qualitative thematic analysis to open-text responses from a multinational rapid response survey of primary health care experts assessing response to the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsRespondents' comments focused on three main areas of primary health care response directly influenced by the pandemic: 1) impact on the primary care workforce, including task-shifting responsibilities outside clinician specialty and changes in scope of work, financial strains on practices, and the daily uncertainties and stress of a constantly evolving situation; 2) impact on patient care delivery, both essential care for COVID-19 cases and the non-essential care that was neglected or postponed; 3) and the shift to using new technologies.

conclusionsPrimary health care experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic across the globe were similar in their levels of workforce stress, rapid technologic adaptation, and need to pivot delivery strategies, often at the expense of routine care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicPatient carePrimary health careQualitative researchWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35043104
PMCPMC8755427
OpenAlexW4205755760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.