Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35043073›Full record

ArticleProcedia computer science2022

Public sentiment towards face-to-face activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia.

Nurmawiya, Khalista Arkania Harvian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Procedia computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

NurmawiyaBPS-Statistics of Natuna Regency, Natuna 29783, Indonesia.
Khalista Arkania HarvianBPS-Statistics of Banjarmasin Municipality, Banjarmasin 70235, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A year after the COVID-19 pandemic took place, activities that were carried out online gradually switched back to face-to-face. This has caused controversy given the high transmission. Therefore, this study aims to analyze public sentiment by utilizing Twitter data. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was also conducted in this study to classify public opinion. It was found that face-to-face learning was the highlight of public conversation and was dominated by negative sentiment, followed by neutral and positive sentiment. Meanwhile, the LDA model produced topics about vaccination, public preference, school reopening, public sentiment, students' longing for face-to-face learning and face-to-face learning plan.

Indexed as

COVID-19face-to-face activitiesLDASentiment analysistext mining

Identifiers

PMID35043073
PMCPMC8756763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.