Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Iterative data-driven forecasting of the transmission and management of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 using social interventions at the county-level.

Ken Newcomb, Morgan E Smith, Rose E Donohue, Sebastian Wyngaard, Caleb Reinking, Christopher R Sweet, Marissa J Levine, Thomas R Unnasch, Edwin Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ken NewcombCenter for Global Health Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Morgan E SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Rose E DonohueDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Sebastian WyngaardCenter for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Caleb ReinkingCenter for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Christopher R SweetCenter for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Marissa J LevineCenter for Leadership in Public Health Practice, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Thomas R UnnaschCenter for Global Health Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Edwin MichaelCenter for Global Health Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. emichael443@usf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of the initial outbreak and spread of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 via the application of population-wide non-pharmaceutical mitigation measures have led to remarkable successes in dampening the pandemic globally. However, with countries beginning to ease or lift these measures fully to restart activities, concern is growing regarding the impacts that such reopening of societies could have on the subsequent transmission of the virus. While mathematical models of COVID-19 transmission have played important roles in evaluating the impacts of these measures for curbing virus transmission, a key need is for models that are able to effectively capture the effects of the spatial and social heterogeneities that drive the epidemic dynamics observed at the local community level. Iterative forecasting that uses new incoming epidemiological and social behavioral data to sequentially update locally-applicable transmission models can overcome this gap, potentially resulting in better predictions and policy actions. Here, we present the development of one such data-driven iterative modelling tool based on publicly available data and an extended SEIR model for forecasting SARS-CoV-2 at the county level in the United States. Using data from the state of Florida, we demonstrate the utility of such a system for exploring the outcomes of the social measures proposed by policy makers for containing the course of the pandemic. We provide comprehensive results showing how the locally identified models could be employed for accessing the impacts and societal tradeoffs of using specific social protective strategies. We conclude that it could have been possible to lift the more disruptive social interventions related to movement restriction/social distancing measures earlier if these were accompanied by widespread testing and contact tracing. These intensified social interventions could have potentially also brought about the control of the epidemic in low- and some medium-incidence county settings first, supporting the development and deployment of a geographically-phased approach to reopening the economy of Florida. We have made our data-driven forecasting system publicly available for policymakers and health officials to use in their own locales, so that a more efficient coordinated strategy for controlling SARS-CoV-2 region-wide can be developed and successfully implemented.

Indexed as

Contact TracingCOVID-19Models, BiologicalPandemicsPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2FloridaForecastingHumans

Identifiers

PMID35042958
PMCPMC8766467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.