Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042926›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Quantifying protein abundance on single cells using split-pool sequencing on DNA-barcoded antibodies for diagnostic applications.

Jenny Sheng, Eldad A Hod, George Vlad, Alejandro Chavez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny ShengIntegrated Program in Cellular, Molecular, and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Eldad A HodDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
George VladDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Alejandro ChavezDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ac4304@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins play critical roles across all facets of biology, with their abundance frequently used as markers of cell identity and state. The most popular method for detecting proteins on single cells, flow cytometry, is limited by considerations of fluorescent spectral overlap. While mass cytometry (CyTOF) allows for the detection of upwards of 40 epitopes simultaneously, it requires local access to specialized instrumentation not commonly accessible to many laboratories. To overcome these limitations, we independently developed a method to quantify multiple protein targets on single cells without the need for specialty equipment other than access to widely available next generation sequencing (NGS) services. We demonstrate that this combinatorial indexing method compares favorably to traditional flow-cytometry, and allows over two dozen target proteins to be assayed at a time on single cells. To showcase the potential of the technique, we analyzed peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates from human clinical samples, and identified pathogenic cellular subsets with high fidelity. The ease of use of this technique makes it a promising technology for high-throughput proteomics and for interrogating complex samples such as those from patients with leukemia.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSingle-Cell AnalysisAntibodiesDNAHumansProteomicsAntibodiesDNA

Identifiers

PMID35042926
PMCPMC8766443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.