Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042888›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

A retrospective study of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in critically ill patients in the ICU.

Răzvan Bologheanu, Paul Lichtenegger, Mathias Maleczek, Daniel Laxar, Eva Schaden, Oliver Kimberger

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Răzvan BologheanuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. razvan.bologheanu@meduniwien.ac.at.
Paul LichteneggerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mathias MaleczekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel LaxarLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchadenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oliver KimbergerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugammadex has been approved for reversal of neuromuscular blockade by vecuronium and rocuronium in adults undergoing surgery. Although widely used in the operating room, sugammadex has not been investigated in the intensive care unit setting. This study aimed to evaluate the use of sugammadex in critically ill patients with a focus on known drug-related adverse reactions. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, 91 critically ill patients who were administered sugammadex while in the ICU were evaluated. Electronic health records were reviewed, and baseline data, as well as indication and incidence of complications possibly related to sugammadex, were retrospectively collected. The most common procedures requiring neuromuscular blockade followed by reversal with sugammadex were bronchoscopy, percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Within 2 h following administration of sugammadex, skin rash and use of antihistamines were reported in 4 patients (4.4%) in total; bradycardia was observed in 9 patients (9.9%), and respiratory adverse events were described in 3 patients (3.3%). New-onset bleeding up to 24 h after sugammadex was reported in 7 patients (7.7%), 3of whom received transfusions of packed red blood cells. Sugammadex was well tolerated in critically ill patients and could be considered for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in this population. Larger prospective studies are required to determine the safety profile and evaluate the potential benefit and indications of sugammadex in the critical care setting.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsNeuromuscular BlockadeRocuroniumSugammadexAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID35042888
PMCPMC8766455
OpenAlexW4206139885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.