Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042806›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Threatened Species Initiative: Empowering conservation action using genomic resources.

Carolyn J Hogg, Kym Ottewell, Peter Latch, Maurizio Rossetto, James Biggs, Andrew Gilbert, Sarah Richmond, Katherine Belov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Conservation should assume realistic adaptive capacities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn J HoggSchool of Life & Environmental Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Carolyn.hogg@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-398X
Kym OttewellConservation Science Centre, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation, & Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-3224
Peter LatchAustralian Government Department of Agriculture, Water & Environment, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Maurizio RossettoResearch Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Australian Institute of Botanical Science, The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-9114
James BiggsZoo and Aquarium Association Australasia, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia.
Andrew GilbertBioplatforms Australia, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3530-4501
Sarah RichmondBioplatforms Australia, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
Katherine BelovSchool of Life & Environmental Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Bioplatforms Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUAustralian Government · AUAustralia Zoo · AURoyal Botanic Garden Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, 15,521 animal species are listed as threatened by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, and of these less than 3% have genomic resources that can inform conservation management. To combat this, global genome initiatives are developing genomic resources, yet production of a reference genome alone does not conserve a species. The reference genome allows us to develop a suite of tools to understand both genome-wide and functional diversity within and between species. Conservation practitioners can use these tools to inform their decision-making. But, at present there is an implementation gap between the release of genome information and the use of genomic data in applied conservation by conservation practitioners. In May 2020, we launched the Threatened Species Initiative and brought a consortium of genome biologists, population biologists, bioinformaticians, population geneticists, and ecologists together with conservation agencies across Australia, including government, zoos, and nongovernment organizations. Our objective is to create a foundation of genomic data to advance our understanding of key Australian threatened species, and ultimately empower conservation practitioners to access and apply genomic data to their decision-making processes through a web-based portal. Currently, we are developing genomic resources for 61 threatened species from a range of taxa, across Australia, with more than 130 collaborators from government, academia, and conservation organizations. Developed in direct consultation with government threatened-species managers and other conservation practitioners, herein we present our framework for meeting their needs and our systematic approach to integrating genomics into threatened species recovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesData CollectionEndangered SpeciesGenomeGenomicsGovernmentapplied conservationendangeredgenomesmanagementreduced representation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35042806
PMCPMC8795520
OpenAlexW4205764108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.