Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042801›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Why sequence all eukaryotes?

Mark Blaxter, John M Archibald, Anna K Childers, Jonathan A Coddington, Keith A Crandall, Federica Di Palma, Richard Durbin, Scott V Edwards, Jennifer A M Graves, Kevin J Hackett and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Orphan genes are not a distinct biological entity.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Mark BlaxterWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom; mb35@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-949X
John M ArchibaldDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4H7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-780X
Anna K ChildersBee Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD 20705.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-8539
Jonathan A CoddingtonGlobal Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-7730
Keith A CrandallComputational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-3389
Federica Di PalmaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-0102
Richard DurbinWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9130-1006
Scott V EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-6217
Jennifer A M GravesSchool of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 751 23, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6480-7856
Kevin J HackettCrop Production and Protection, Office of National Programs, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.ORCID 0000-0002-7459-7175
Neil HallEarlham Institute, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2808-0009
Erich D JarvisLaboratory of the Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Rebecca N JohnsonNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-2827
Elinor K KarlssonBioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-3776
W John KressBotany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012.ORCID 0000-0002-0140-5267
Shigehiro KurakuDepartment of Genomics and Evolutionary Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-8388
Mara K N LawniczakWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-0253
Jose V LopezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL 33004.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-4125
Nancy A MoranIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-9769
Gene E RobinsonCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.ORCID 0000-0003-4828-4068
Oliver A RyderConservation Genetics, Division of Biology, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA 92027.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-763X
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0001-9310-8659
Tandy WarnowDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61301.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-3514
Guojie ZhangVillum Center for Biodiversity Genomics, Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-1521
Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-7287

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9817Wellcome Trust 206194Wellcome Trust 207492/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life on Earth has evolved from initial simplicity to the astounding complexity we experience today. Bacteria and archaea have largely excelled in metabolic diversification, but eukaryotes additionally display abundant morphological innovation. How have these innovations come about and what constraints are there on the origins of novelty and the continuing maintenance of biodiversity on Earth? The history of life and the code for the working parts of cells and systems are written in the genome. The Earth BioGenome Project has proposed that the genomes of all extant, named eukaryotes-about 2 million species-should be sequenced to high quality to produce a digital library of life on Earth, beginning with strategic phylogenetic, ecological, and high-impact priorities. Here we discuss why we should sequence all eukaryotic species, not just a representative few scattered across the many branches of the tree of life. We suggest that many questions of evolutionary and ecological significance will only be addressable when whole-genome data representing divergences at all of the branchings in the tree of life or all species in natural ecosystems are available. We envisage that a genomic tree of life will foster understanding of the ongoing processes of speciation, adaptation, and organismal dependencies within entire ecosystems. These explorations will resolve long-standing problems in phylogenetics, evolution, ecology, conservation, agriculture, bioindustry, and medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEcologyEcosystemEukaryotaGenomeGenomicsHumansPhylogenyconservationdiversityecologyevolutiongenome

Identifiers

PMID35042801
PMCPMC8795522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.