Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042793›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

An endemic pathway to sheep and goat domestication at Aşıklı Höyük (Central Anatolia, Turkey).

Mary C Stiner, Natalie D Munro, Hijlke Buitenhuis, Güneş Duru, Mihriban Özbaşaran

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary C StinerSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; mstiner@arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-9535
Natalie D MunroDepartment of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-6133
Hijlke BuitenhuisArcheosupport, 9712 LN Groningen, The Netherlands.
Güneş DuruFaculty of Conservation and Restoration of Culture Property, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, 34427 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-0120
Mihriban ÖzbaşaranPrehistory Department, Faculty of Letters, Istanbul University, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-948X
Archeologisch Diensten Centrum (Netherlands) · NLIstanbul University · TRMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi · TRUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sheep and goats (caprines) were domesticated in Southwest Asia in the early Holocene, but how and in how many places remain open questions. This study investigates the initial conditions and trajectory of caprine domestication at Aşıklı Höyük, which preserves an unusually high-resolution record of the first 1,000 y of Neolithic existence in Central Anatolia. Our comparative analysis of caprine age and sex structures and related evidence reveals a local domestication process that began around 8400 cal BC. Caprine management at Aşıklı segued through three viable systems. The earliest mode was embedded within a broad-spectrum foraging economy and directed to live meat storage on a small scale. This was essentially a "catch-and-grow" strategy that involved seasonal capture of wild lambs and kids from the surrounding highlands and raising them several months prior to slaughter within the settlement. The second mode paired modest levels of caprine reproduction on site with continued recruitment of wild infants. The third mode shows the hallmarks of a large-scale herding economy based on a large, reproductively viable captive population but oddly directed to harvesting adult animals, contra to most later Neolithic practices. Wild infant capture likely continued at a low level. The transitions were gradual but, with time, gave rise to early domesticated forms and monumental differences in human labor organization, settlement layout, and waste accumulation. Aşıklı was an independent center of caprine domestication and thus supports the multiple origins evolutionary model.

Indexed as

DomesticationAgricultureAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, DomesticArchaeologyGeographyGoatsHistory, AncientHumansSelective BreedingSheepTurkeyforager–producer transitionmortality patternspre-Pottery Neolithicsheep and goat managementzooarchaeology

Identifiers

PMID35042793
PMCPMC8795544
OpenAlexW4205313666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.