Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042765›Full record

SynthesisBMJ quality & safety2022

Medication-related interventions to improve medication safety and patient outcomes on transition from adult intensive care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Richard S Bourne, Jennifer K Jennings, Maria Panagioti, Alexander Hodkinson, Anthea Sutton, Darren M Ashcroft

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ quality & safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medication-related problems in critical care survivors: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Choosing Wisely Canada climate-conscious recommendations for critical care medicine.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Why is it so hard to reduce harm from medicines?Future healthcare journal · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Richard S BournePharmacy and Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK richard.bourne1@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-525X
Jennifer K JenningsPharmacy and Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Maria PanagiotiNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alexander HodkinsonNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anthea SuttonSchool of Health and Related Sciences (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Darren M AshcroftNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients recovering from an episode in an intensive care unit (ICU) frequently experience medication errors on transition to the hospital ward. Structured handover recommendations often underestimate the challenges and complexity of ICU patient transitions. For adult ICU patients transitioning to a hospital ward, it is currently unclear what interventions reduce the risks of medication errors.The aims were to examine the impact of medication-related interventions on medication and patient outcomes on transition from adult ICU settings and identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.

methodsThe systematic review protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO. Six electronic databases were searched until October 2020 for controlled and uncontrolled study designs that reported medication-related (ie, de-prescribing; medication errors) or patient-related outcomes (ie, mortality; length of stay). Risk of bias (RoB) assessment used V.2.0 and ROBINS-I Cochrane tools. Where feasible, random-effects meta-analysis was used for pooling the OR across studies. The quality of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

resultsSeventeen studies were eligible, 15 (88%) were uncontrolled before-after studies. The intervention components included education of staff (n=8 studies), medication review (n=7), guidelines (n=6), electronic transfer/handover tool or letter (n=4) and medicines reconciliation (n=4). Overall, pooled analysis of all interventions reduced risk of inappropriate medication continuation at ICU discharge (OR=0.45 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.63), I

conclusionsMulticomponent interventions based on education of staff and guidelines were effective at achieving almost four times more de-prescribing of inappropriate medication by the time of patient hospital discharge. Based on the findings, practice and policy recommendations are made and guidance is provided on the need for, and design of theory informed interventions in this area, including the requirement for process and economic evaluations.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsAdultHumansMedication ErrorsPatient DischargePharmacistscritical caremedication safetypatient safetytransitions in care

Identifiers

PMID35042765
PMCPMC9304084
OpenAlexW4206493994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.