ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022
Tackling racism in UK health research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Engagement and Intersectionality in Digital Self-Management Interventions for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From tokenism to transformation: lessons from the TOGETHER study for building inclusive and equitable research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- "It's exactly what's needed": a call to action for breastmilk studies of vertical HIV transmission in high-income countries.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Nonrandom Missingness in Child Race and Ethnicity Records and the US Federal Data Standards: Pooled Analysis of Community-Based Child Health Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Understanding Inclusion and Participation of People From Black African Diaspora Communities in Health and Care Research: A Realist Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Review
- Lessons learnt from developing an ethnically diverse patient and public involvement group for breast cancer research.BMJ open · 2025Review
- Operationalising routinely collected patient data in research to further the pursuit of social justice and health equity: a team-based scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Hearing the Silence and Silenced: Co-Producing Research on Infant-Feeding Experiences and Practices With Black Women With HIV.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- Where are my Black professors? The research culture preventing Black researchers from thriving in UK institutions.Wellcome open research · 2025Review
- Supporting healthcare professionals from ethnic minority backgrounds to 'Step Into' a clinical academic career.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2024Article
- NIHR Race Equality Framework: development of a tool for addressing racial equality in public involvement.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Racialised staff-patient relationships in inpatient mental health wards: a realist secondary qualitative analysis of patient experience data.BMJ mental health · 2023Article
- Observational
- Engaging and supporting the public on the topic of grief and bereavement: an evaluation of Good Grief Festival.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.