Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042705›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot.

Eva N Woodward, Cathleen Willging, Sara J Landes, Leslie R M Hausmann, Karen L Drummond, Songthip Ounpraseuth, Irenia A Ball, JoAnn E Kirchner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eva N WoodwardVA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, Arkansas, USA eva.woodward@va.gov.
Cathleen WillgingBehavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6446-5083
Sara J LandesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Leslie R M HausmannDepartment of Medicine, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karen L DrummondVA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Songthip OunpraseuthDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Irenia A BallVA Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-4882
JoAnn E KirchnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USInstitute for Research and Evaluation · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Veteran Engagement Implementation Strategies to Prevent Rural Veteran SuicideIK2HX003065 · VA · CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HLTHCARE SYS · PI Eva Woodward · 2020 to 2026
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX003065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementation researchers could draw from participatory research to engage patients (consumers of healthcare) in implementation processes and possibly reduce healthcare disparities. There is a little consumer involvement in healthcare implementation, partially because no formal guidance exists. We will create and pilot a toolkit of methods to engage consumers from the US' Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in selecting and tailoring implementation strategies. This toolkit, Consumer Voice, will provide guidance on what, when, where, how and why an implementer might engage consumers in implementing treatments. We will pilot the toolkit by implementing Safety Planning Intervention for suicide prevention with rural veterans, a population with suicide disparities. Safety Planning Intervention is effective for reducing suicidal behaviours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In Aim 1, we will use participatory approaches and user-centred design to develop Consumer Voice and its methods. In Aim 2, we will pilot Consumer Voice by implementing the Safety Planning Intervention in two clinics serving rural VHA patients. One site will receive a current implementation strategy (Implementation Facilitation) only; the second will receive Implementation Facilitation plus Consumer Voice. We will use mixed methods to assess feasibility and acceptability of Consumer Voice. We will compare sites on preliminary implementation (reach, adoption, fidelity) and clinical outcomes (depression severity, suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour). In Aim 3, we will evaluate Aim 2 outcomes at 20 months to assess sustained impact. We will gather qualitative data on sustainability of the Safety Planning Intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: These studies are overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. We plan to use traditional academic modalities of dissemination (eg, conferences, publications). We plan to disseminate findings through meetings with other trainers in implementation practice so they may adopt Consumer Voice. We plan to share results with local community boards.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesVeteransFeasibility StudiesHumansRural PopulationSuicidal Ideationmental healthpublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35042705
PMCPMC8768923
OpenAlexW4205638219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.