Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042687›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Incorporating dose effects in network meta-analysis.

Jennifer A Watt, Cinzia Del Giovane, Dan Jackson, Rebecca M Turner, Andrea C Tricco, Dimitris Mavridis, Sharon E Straus, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Optimal dose and type of exercise improve the overall balance in adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer A WattKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cinzia Del GiovaneInstitute of Primary Health Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dan JacksonStatistical Innovation Group, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Rebecca M TurnerMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Andrea C TriccoKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dimitris MavridisDepartment of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Sharon E StrausKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Areti-Angeliki VeronikiKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-6013

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/06Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/07Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalDose-Response Relationship, DrugSystematic Reviews as TopicAntipsychotic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsDementiaHeadacheHumansNauseaNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsStrokeAntipsychotic AgentsCholinesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35042687
PMCPMC7614774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.