Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042590›Full record

ArticleJournal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing

Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic: Virtual nursing education for delirium care.

Anna Bourgault, Elizabeth Mayerson, Michelle Nai, Angela Orsini-Garry, Ivy M Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna BourgaultUniversity of Connecticut School of Nursing, United States of America.
Elizabeth MayersonUniversity of Connecticut School of Nursing, United States of America. Electronic address: elizabeth.mayerson@uconn.edu.
Michelle NaiUniversity of Connecticut School of Nursing, United States of America.
Angela Orsini-GarryUniversity of Connecticut School of Nursing, United States of America.
Ivy M AlexanderUniversity of Connecticut School of Nursing, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnology is increasingly used in nursing education, particularly during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 also brought new challenges to patient care and limited access to in-person clinical experiences for nursing students. Pivoting to virtual simulation (VS) for clinical was necessary during the height of the pandemic. With students' return to clinical settings, VS experiences continue to be needed, due to quarantine of clinical settings and/or shortage of available clinical sites. VS clinical experiences have been successfully utilized over the past decade; however, the literature lacks resources on the use of VS for delirium care of patients.

methodIn this article, the authors describe the creation and provision of a VS clinical day using interactive computer-based technology to educate nursing students to prevent, recognize, and manage delirium. The VS clinical was in conjunction with a Behavioral Health course.

resultsEvaluation of students demonstrated attainment of objectives. Students reported satisfaction with the VS experience.

conclusionTechnology in nursing education and use of VS clinical provide effective strategies for clinical learning when in-person clinical experiences are unavailable, either due to access limitations or lack of patients with specific health needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19DeliriumEducation, NursingStudents, NursingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Clinical experienceCOVID-19DeliriumNursing educationTechnologyVirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID35042590
PMCPMC8654606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.