Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042561›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Comparison and evaluation of statistical error models for scRNA-seq.

Saket Choudhary, Rahul Satija

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 424 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
424citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
48.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

424 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 620 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping Embryonic Mouse Lung Development Using Enhanced Spatial Transcriptomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. EBF1 Regulates Cardiac Development Through Fibroblast to Myocyte Signaling.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immune-Responsive Bioinks Enable Vision-GuidedAdvanced functional materials · 2026
    Article

364 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saket ChoudharyNew York Genome Center, 101 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 100013, USA.
Rahul SatijaNew York Genome Center, 101 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 100013, USA. rsatija@nygenome.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9448-8833
New York Genome Center · US

Funding

Center for Integrated Cellular Analysis - Valeria A. Sanchez EstradaRM1HG011014 · NHGRI · NEW YORK GENOME CENTER · PI LANDAU, DAN, SATIJA, RAHUL · 2020 to 2025
$22.1M
Comprehensive reference map construction, geolocation and data integration for HuBMAP HIVEOT2OD026673 · OD · NEW YORK GENOME CENTER · PI MARIONI, JOHN CARLO, SATIJA, RAHUL · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
Learning the metadata of the cell with single cell genomicsDP2HG009623 · NHGRI · NEW YORK GENOME CENTER · PI SATIJA, RAHUL · 2016 to 2016
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS DP2 HG009623NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG011014NIH HHS OT2 OD026673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeterogeneity in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data is driven by multiple sources, including biological variation in cellular state as well as technical variation introduced during experimental processing. Deconvolving these effects is a key challenge for preprocessing workflows. Recent work has demonstrated the importance and utility of count models for scRNA-seq analysis, but there is a lack of consensus on which statistical distributions and parameter settings are appropriate.

resultsHere, we analyze 59 scRNA-seq datasets that span a wide range of technologies, systems, and sequencing depths in order to evaluate the performance of different error models. We find that while a Poisson error model appears appropriate for sparse datasets, we observe clear evidence of overdispersion for genes with sufficient sequencing depth in all biological systems, necessitating the use of a negative binomial model. Moreover, we find that the degree of overdispersion varies widely across datasets, systems, and gene abundances, and argues for a data-driven approach for parameter estimation.

conclusionsBased on these analyses, we provide a set of recommendations for modeling variation in scRNA-seq data, particularly when using generalized linear models or likelihood-based approaches for preprocessing and downstream analysis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisLikelihood FunctionsSequence Analysis, RNAWorkflowDifferential expressionDimension reductionFeature selectionNormalizationSingle-cell RNA-seqVariable genes

Identifiers

PMID35042561
PMCPMC8764781
OpenAlexW4225343266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.