Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042541›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Adapting systematic scoping study methods to identify cancer-specific physical activity opportunities in Ontario, Canada.

Angela J Fong, Catherine M Sabiston, Kaitlyn D Kauffeldt, Jennifer R Tomasone

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela J FongSection of Behavioral Sciences, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903-2681, USA. angela.fong@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-6427
Catherine M SabistonFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Kaitlyn D KauffeldtSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Jennifer R TomasoneSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Queen's University · CARutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying cancer-specific physical activity programs and post-secondary courses targeting students in academic settings (i.e., "real world" opportunities) may promote physical activity behaviors among cancer survivors. Using knowledge synthesis methods such as systematic scoping study methods may facilitate knowledge tool development and guide evidence-based practice to improve knowledge transfer. However, identifying these opportunities poses a challenge as systematic scoping study methods have yet to be applied and adapted to this context. Thus, to extend systematic scoping study methods, the purpose of the current investigation is to describe the adaptation of systematic scoping study methods in the context of cancer-specific "real world" opportunities in Ontario, Canada.

methodsSystematic scoping study methods were adapted to develop a knowledge tool, which was a credible resource website for researchers, clinicians, and survivors. Three search strategies including Advanced Google Search, targeted website search, and consultations with experts were used to identify eligible (e.g., appropriate for cancer survivors, offered in the community) cancer-specific physical activity programs. Only the targeted website search was used to search post-secondary institutions because they are centralized onto one government website.

resultsFifty-eight programs and 10 post-secondary courses met the eligibility criteria. Relevant data from these opportunities were extracted, charted, synthesized, and uploaded onto the resource website. The most successful search strategy for cancer-specific physical activity programs was the targeted website search followed by Google Advanced Search and consultations with content experts.

conclusionsChallenges were experienced due to lack of standard reporting among opportunities, bias of potentially relevant records, and changing nature of resulting records. The current investigation demonstrated that systematic scoping study methods can be applied to cancer-specific physical activity programs and post-secondary courses in the context of cancer survivorship in Ontario yielding robust results. The method can be further adapted and updated in future knowledge syntheses in health-related contexts. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The systematic scoping review method protocol has not been registered.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsEvidence-Based PracticeExerciseHumansOntarioCancer survivorshipDissemination and implementation scienceKnowledge synthesisKnowledge translationPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID35042541
PMCPMC8765105
OpenAlexW4205937123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.