Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042529›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Single-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations with either BNT162b2 or AZD1222 induce disparate Th1 responses and IgA production.

Michael Müller, Johann Volzke, Behnam Subin, Silke Müller, Martina Sombetzki, Emil C Reisinger, Brigitte Müller-Hilke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Müller *Core Facility for Cell Sorting and Cell Analysis, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Johann Volzke *Core Facility for Cell Sorting and Cell Analysis, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. johann.volzke@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-6276
Behnam SubinDepartment of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Silke MüllerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Martina SombetzkiDivision of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Center of Internal Medicine II, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Emil C ReisingerDivision of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Center of Internal Medicine II, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte Müller-HilkeCore Facility for Cell Sorting and Cell Analysis, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile vaccination programs against the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are globally ongoing, disparate strategies for the deployment of spike antigen show varying effectiveness.

methodsIn order to explore this phenomenon, we sought to compare the early immune responses against AZD1222 and BNT162b2. SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants received a single dose of either vaccine and were analyzed for immune cell, effector T cell, and antibody dynamics.

resultsAZD1222 induced transient leukopenia and major changes among innate and adaptive subpopulations. Both vaccines induced spike protein-specific effector T cells which were dominated by type 1 helper T cell responses following AZD1222 vaccination. A significant reduction of anti-inflammatory T cells upon re-stimulation was also restricted to AZD1222 vaccinees. While IgM and IgG were the dominant isotypes elicited by AZD1222, BNT162b2 led to a significant production of IgG and IgA.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the strategy for spike protein delivery impacts on how and to what extent immune priming against the main SARS-CoV-2 antigen proceeds.

Indexed as

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin ASARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AAZD1222BNT162b2COVID-19Cytotoxic T cellsSARS-CoV-2Type 1 helper T cellsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35042529
PMCPMC8766223
OpenAlexW4205607747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.