Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042523›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

HairNet: a deep learning model to score leaf hairiness, a key phenotype for cotton fibre yield, value and insect resistance.

Vivien Rolland, Moshiur R Farazi, Warren C Conaty, Deon Cameron, Shiming Liu, Lars Petersson, Warwick N Stiller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Speed breeding in upland cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivien Rolland *CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clunies Ross St, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. vivien.rolland@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-1287
Moshiur R Farazi *CSIRO Data61, Clunies Ross St, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-5921
Warren C ConatyCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-153X
Deon CameronCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.
Shiming LiuCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5098-3103
Lars PeterssonCSIRO Data61, Clunies Ross St, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-1904
Warwick N StillerCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Julius Career Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeaf hairiness (pubescence) is an important plant phenotype which regulates leaf transpiration, affects sunlight penetration, and provides increased resistance or susceptibility against certain insects. Cotton accounts for 80% of global natural fibre production, and in this crop leaf hairiness also affects fibre yield and value. Currently, this key phenotype is measured visually which is slow, laborious and operator-biased. Here, we propose a simple, high-throughput and low-cost imaging method combined with a deep-learning model, HairNet, to classify leaf images with great accuracy.

resultsA dataset of [Formula: see text] 13,600 leaf images from 27 genotypes of Cotton was generated. Images were collected from leaves at two different positions in the canopy (leaf 3 & leaf 4), from genotypes grown in two consecutive years and in two growth environments (glasshouse & field). This dataset was used to build a 4-part deep learning model called HairNet. On the whole dataset, HairNet achieved accuracies of 89% per image and 95% per leaf. The impact of leaf selection, year and environment on HairNet accuracy was then investigated using subsets of the whole dataset. It was found that as long as examples of the year and environment tested were present in the training population, HairNet achieved very high accuracy per image (86-96%) and per leaf (90-99%). Leaf selection had no effect on HairNet accuracy, making it a robust model.

conclusionsHairNet classifies images of cotton leaves according to their hairiness with very high accuracy. The simple imaging methodology presented in this study and the high accuracy on a single image per leaf achieved by HairNet demonstrates that it is implementable at scale. We propose that HairNet replaces the current visual scoring of this trait. The HairNet code and dataset can be used as a baseline to measure this trait in other species or to score other microscopic but important phenotypes.

Indexed as

CottonDeep learningHairHairinessLeafMachine learningNeural networkPhenotypingPubescenceTrichome

Identifiers

PMID35042523
PMCPMC8767704
OpenAlexW4206357035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.