Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042494›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.

Regina Skar-Fröding, Hanne Clausen, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Torleif Ruud, Mike Slade, Kristin S Heiervang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271242 (A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271242 completednot on this map

A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled325ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsSystematic implementation support, No implementation support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Regina Skar-FrödingR&D Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. Regina.froeding@ahus.no.
Hanne ClausenR&D Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torleif RuudR&D Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kristin S HeiervangR&D Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the relationship between service user-rated personal recovery and clinician-rated and service user-rated clinical recovery. The relationships between different subdomains of clinical recovery and personal recovery were also assessed.

methodsIn total, 318 mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis and their clinicians from 39 sites across Norway completed standardized questionnaires regarding personal recovery, clinical symptoms and psychosocial functioning. Regression models were used to investigate the relationship between personal and clinical recovery.

resultsOverall, clinical recovery was positively associated with personal recovery, when rated both by service users and by clinicians. Personal recovery was associated with lower levels of depression, self-harm and problems with relationships when rated by the service users. Among the subdomains rated by the clinicians, personal recovery was associated with fewer problems with relationships and higher aggressiveness.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that affective symptoms are associated with personal recovery, indicating the need for greater focus on depression treatment among people with psychosis. Improving social connections is of importance for personal recovery, and might be an area where clinicians and service users can meet and find agreement on important treatment goals.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNorwaySurveys and QuestionnairesClinical recoveryPersonal recoveryPROMPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID35042494
PMCPMC8764788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.