Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042471›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

The inconsistency between two major aneuploidy-screening platforms-single-nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing-in the detection of embryo mosaicism.

Dongjia Chen, Yan Xu, Chenhui Ding, Yali Wang, Yu Fu, Bing Cai, Jing Wang, Rong Li, Jing Guo, Jiafu Pan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongjia Chen *Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-2575
Yan Xu *Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Chenhui DingReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yali WangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yu FuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Bing CaiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Jing WangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Rong LiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Jing GuoReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Jiafu PanReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yanhong ZengReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yiping ZhongReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoting ShenReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. shenxiaot@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Canquan ZhouReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. zhoucanquan@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNHainan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), appropriate evaluation of mosaic embryos is important because of the adverse implications of transferring embryos with high-level mosaicism or discarding those with low-level mosaicism. Despite the availability of multiple reliable techniques for PGT-A, data comparing the detection of mosaicism using these techniques are scarce. To address this gap in the literature, we compared the detection ability of the two most commonly used PGT-A platforms, next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, for mosaic embryos.

resultsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of PGT-A or preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) conducted at our center from January 2018 to October 2020, and selected blastocysts that underwent aneuploidy screening with both an SNP array and NGS. Trophectoderm biopsy, multiple displacement amplification (MDA), and aneuploidy screening with an SNP array were conducted on the enrolled blastocysts. When the SNP array indicated mosaicism, NGS was performed on the corresponding MDA product for verification. Among the 105 blastocysts diagnosed with mosaicism with the SNP array, 80 (76.19%) showed mosaicism in NGS, with complete and partial concordance rates of 47.62% (50/105) and 18.10% (19/105), respectively. The complete discordance rate of the two platforms was 34.29% (36/105). That is, 10.48% (11/105) of the blastocysts were diagnosed with completely different types of mosaicism with the two platforms, while 13.33% (14/105) and 10.48% (11/105) of the embryos diagnosed as showing mosaicism with SNP were detected as showing aneuploidy and euploidy with NGS, respectively.

conclusionsThe consistency of NGS and the SNP array in the diagnosis of embryo mosaicism is extremely low, indicating the need for larger and well-designed studies to determine which platform is more accurate in detecting mosaic embryos.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyBlastocystFemaleGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMosaicismPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyRetrospective StudiesMosaicismMultiple displacement amplificationNext-generation sequencingPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidiesSingle-nucleotide polymorphism array

Identifiers

PMID35042471
PMCPMC8764859
OpenAlexW4205535000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.