Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042390›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Disparities in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Rate of Cervical Cancer among Women with and without Disabilities.

Jin Young Choi, Kyoung Eun Yeob, Seung Hwa Hong, So Young Kim, Eun-Hwan Jeong, Dong Wook Shin, Jong Heon Park, Gil-Won Kang, Hak Soon Kim, Jong Hyock Park and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Vaccines · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin Young ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58928Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Eun YeobCollege of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, 34933Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hwa HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34933Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
So Young KimCollege of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, 34933Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Hwan JeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34933Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Dong Wook ShinSupportive Care Center/ Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Heon ParkBig Data Steering Department, 451012National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea.
Gil-Won KangDepartment of Health Informatics and Management, College of Medicine, 34933Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Hak Soon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34933Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyock ParkCollege of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, 34933Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-0827
Ichiro KawachiHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 1812Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Chungbuk National University · KRHarvard University · USChungbuk National University Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNot much is known regarding the disparities in cancer care between women with and without disabilities.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of women with cervical cancer with and without disabilities.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study and linked the National Disability Database, Korean Central Cancer Registry, and Korean National Health Insurance claims database. Charlson comorbidity index was used for adjusting the comorbidity. The study population comprised 3 185 women with disabilities (physical/brain, communication, mental, cardiopulmonary, and other impairment) who were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 13 582 age- and sex-matched women without disability who were diagnosed with cervical cancer for comparison.

resultsDistant metastatic stage (7.7% vs 3.7%) and unknown stage (16.1% vs 7.0%) were more common in cervical cancer women with grade 1 disabilities, compared with women without disabilities. Women with cervical cancer with disabilities were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.90) or chemotherapy (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97). Lower rate of surgery was more evident in patients with physical/brain impairment (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.58) and severe mental impairment (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.81). The overall mortality risk was also higher in patients with disabilities (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.48).

conclusionWomen with cervical cancer with disabilities, especially with severe disabilities, were diagnosed at later stages, received less treatment, and had higher mortality rates, compared with patients who lacked disabilities. Social support and policies, along with education for women with disabilities, their families, and healthcare professionals, are needed to improve these disparities.

Indexed as

AdultDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioPersons with DisabilitiesProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUterine Cervical Neoplasmscervical cancerdisabilitystagesurvivaltreatment

Identifiers

PMID35042390
PMCPMC8771753
OpenAlexW4206692639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.