Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042324›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Operationalising Regional Cooperation for Infectious Disease Control: A Scoping Review of Regional Disease Control Bodies and Networks.

Anna Durrance-Bagale, Manar Marzouk, Sunanda Agarwal, Aparna Ananthakrishnan, Sarah Gan, Michiko Hayashi, Beth Jacob-Chow, Koh Jiayun, Lam Sze Tung, Hala Mkhallalati and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lessons from the G5 Health Cooperation in West Asia: 20 Years After Establishment.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Anna Durrance-BagaleNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-1862
Manar MarzoukNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-1263
Sunanda AgarwalStanford Distinguished Careers Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-2368
Aparna AnanthakrishnanHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7707-2729
Sarah GanNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Michiko HayashiNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3666-7814
Beth Jacob-ChowNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Koh JiayunNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0861-0981
Lam Sze TungNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6033-262X
Hala MkhallalatiNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Sanjida NewazDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-1366
Maryam OmarChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3519-3706
Manit SittimartHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Mengieng UngLee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1411-5442
Yang YuzeNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3384-8502
Hsu Li YangNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Natasha HowardNational University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-7349
National University of Singapore · SGMinistry of Public Health · THChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSingapore University of Technology and Design · SGStanford Health Care · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrates the value of regional cooperation in infectious disease prevention and control. We explored the literature on regional infectious disease control bodies, to identify lessons, barriers and enablers to inform operationalisation of a regional infectious disease control body or network in southeast Asia.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to examine existing literature on regional infectious disease control bodies and networks, and to identify lessons that can be learned that will be useful for operationalisation of a regional infectious disease control body such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Center for Public Health Emergency and Emerging Diseases.

resultsOf the 57 articles included, 53 (93%) were in English, with two (3%) in Spanish and one (2%) each in Dutch and French. Most were commentaries or review articles describing programme initiatives. Sixteen (28%) publications focused on organisations in the Asian continent, with 14 (25%) focused on Africa, and 14 (25%) primarily focused on the European region. Key lessons focused on organisational factors, diagnosis and detection, human resources, communication, accreditation, funding, and sustainability. Enablers and constraints were consistent across regions/ organisations. A clear understanding of the regional context, budgets, cultural or language issues, staffing capacity and governmental priorities, is pivotal. An initial workshop inclusive of the various bodies involved in the design, implementation, monitoring or evaluation of programmes is essential. Clear governance structure, with individual responsibilities clear from the beginning, will reduce friction. Secure, long-term funding is also a key aspect of the success of any programme.

conclusionOperationalisation of regional infectious disease bodies and networks is complicated, but with extensive groundwork, and focus on organisational factors, diagnosis and detection, human resources, communication, accreditation, funding, and sustainability, it is achievable. Ways to promote success are to include as many stakeholders as possible from the beginning, to ensure that context-specific factors are considered, and to encourage employees through capacity building and mentoring, to ensure they feel valued and reduce staff turnover.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPublic HealthCooperationInfectious DiseaseNetworksRegional OrganisationsSoutheast Asia

Identifiers

PMID35042324
PMCPMC9818116
OpenAlexW4205827324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.