Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35042230›Full record

Observational studyBlood advances2022

Lupus anticoagulant test persistence over time and its associations with future thrombotic events.

Meaghan E Colling, Cihan Ay, Daniel Kraemmer, Silvia Koder, Peter Quehenberger, Ingrid Pabinger, Florian Posch, Johanna Gebhart

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Laboratory Profile of Lupus Anticoagulant Positive Cases and its Association with Clinical Presentation- Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meaghan E CollingClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8362-0613
Cihan AyClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-9717
Daniel KraemmerClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-081X
Silvia KoderClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter QuehenbergerDivision of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-8213
Ingrid PabingerClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-9896
Florian PoschDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-6314
Johanna GebhartClinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4578-3120
Medical University of Vienna · ATMedical University of Graz · ATNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on lupus anticoagulant (LA) test stability in patients persistently positive for LA are limited, and its implications on clinical outcomes are lacking. We investigated the rate and predictors of a negative LA test and whether experiencing a negative test affected a patient's risk of future thrombotic events or death in a prospective observational study of persistently LA+ patients. We followed 164 patients (84% women) for a median of 9.2 years and a total of 1438 follow-up visits. During the observation period, 50 thrombotic events (23 arterial and 27 venous events) occurred, and 24 patients died. Forty-six of the patients had at least 1 negative LA test during the observation period, corresponding to a 10-year cumulative incidence of a negative LA test of 28% (95% confidence interval, 20-35). The majority of patients with available follow-up after a negative LA test (n = 41) had at least 1 subsequent positive test for LA (n = 28/41, 68%). Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at baseline was associated with a negative LA test during follow-up. Using a multistate time-to-event model with multivariable adjustment, a negative LA test had no impact on a patient's prospective risk of thrombosis or mortality. We conclude that a negative LA test during observation cannot be used clinically to stratify a patient's risk for future events.

Indexed as

Lupus Coagulation InhibitorThrombosisAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation TestsFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesAnticoagulantsLupus Coagulation Inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID35042230
PMCPMC9131910
OpenAlexW4205774575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.