ArticleResuscitation2022
Deep learning of early brain imaging to predict post-arrest electroencephalography.
Article in Resuscitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Cerebral Edema Detection using Electroencephalography in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- The protocol for mesoscopic wide-field optical imaging in mice: from zero to hero.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Review
- How much information is needed to predict outcomes after cardiac arrest?Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Machine learning to identify hypoxic-ischemic brain injury on early head CT after pediatric cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2025Article
- AI and machine learning in resuscitation: Ongoing research, new concepts, and key challenges.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGuidelines recommend use of computerized tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) in post-arrest prognostication. Strong associations between CT and EEG might obviate the need to acquire both modalities. We quantified these associations via deep learning.
methodsWe performed a single-center, retrospective study including comatose patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest. We extracted brain CT DICOMs, resized and registered each to a standard anatomical atlas, performed skull stripping and windowed images to optimize contrast of the gray-white junction. We classified initial EEG as generalized suppression, other highly pathological findings or benign activity. We extracted clinical information available on presentation from our prospective registry. We trained three machine learning (ML) models to predict EEG from clinical covariates. We used three state-of-the-art approaches to build multi-headed deep learning models using similar model architectures. Finally, we combined the best performing clinical and imaging models. We evaluated discrimination in test sets.
resultsWe included 500 patients, of whom 218 (44%) had benign EEG findings, 135 (27%) showed generalized suppression and 147 (29%) had other highly pathological findings that were most commonly (93%) burst suppression with identical bursts. Clinical ML models had moderate discrimination (test set AUCs 0.73-0.80). Image-based deep learning performed worse (test set AUCs 0.51-0.69), particularly discriminating benign from highly pathological findings. Adding image-based deep learning to clinical models improved prediction of generalized suppression due to accurate detection of severe cerebral edema. DISCUSSION: CT and EEG provide complementary information about post-arrest brain injury. Our results do not support selective acquisition of only one of these modalities, except in the most severely injured patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.