Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041875›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2022

Deep learning of early brain imaging to predict post-arrest electroencephalography.

Jonathan Elmer, Chang Liu, Matthew Pease, Dooman Arefan, Patrick J Coppler, Katharyn L Flickinger, Joseph M Mettenburg, Maria E Baldwin, Niravkumar Barot, Shandong Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Neurology Division, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: elmerjp@upmc.edu.
Chang LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew PeaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dooman ArefanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Patrick J CopplerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Katharyn L FlickingerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joseph M MettenburgDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maria E BaldwinDepartment of Neurology, Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Niravkumar BarotNeurology Division, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shandong WuDepartment of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Quantitative electroencephalography after cardiac arrestK23NS097629 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ELMER, JONATHAN · 2017 to 2021
$945k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS097629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGuidelines recommend use of computerized tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) in post-arrest prognostication. Strong associations between CT and EEG might obviate the need to acquire both modalities. We quantified these associations via deep learning.

methodsWe performed a single-center, retrospective study including comatose patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest. We extracted brain CT DICOMs, resized and registered each to a standard anatomical atlas, performed skull stripping and windowed images to optimize contrast of the gray-white junction. We classified initial EEG as generalized suppression, other highly pathological findings or benign activity. We extracted clinical information available on presentation from our prospective registry. We trained three machine learning (ML) models to predict EEG from clinical covariates. We used three state-of-the-art approaches to build multi-headed deep learning models using similar model architectures. Finally, we combined the best performing clinical and imaging models. We evaluated discrimination in test sets.

resultsWe included 500 patients, of whom 218 (44%) had benign EEG findings, 135 (27%) showed generalized suppression and 147 (29%) had other highly pathological findings that were most commonly (93%) burst suppression with identical bursts. Clinical ML models had moderate discrimination (test set AUCs 0.73-0.80). Image-based deep learning performed worse (test set AUCs 0.51-0.69), particularly discriminating benign from highly pathological findings. Adding image-based deep learning to clinical models improved prediction of generalized suppression due to accurate detection of severe cerebral edema. DISCUSSION: CT and EEG provide complementary information about post-arrest brain injury. Our results do not support selective acquisition of only one of these modalities, except in the most severely injured patients.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBrainElectroencephalographyHumansNeuroimagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBrain injuryCardiac arrestCT imagingElectroencephalographyMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35041875
PMCPMC8923981
OpenAlexW4206723133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.