Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041775›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2022

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses from ALTA-1L: Model-based analyses supporting the brigatinib dose in ALK-positive NSCLC.

Neeraj Gupta, Karen L Reckamp, David R Camidge, Huub J Kleijn, Aziz Ouerdani, Francesco Bellanti, John Maringwa, Michael J Hanley, Shining Wang, Pingkuan Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeraj GuptaTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-5218
Karen L ReckampSamuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David R CamidgeUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Huub J KleijnCertara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Aziz OuerdaniCertara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Francesco BellantiCertara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
John MaringwaCertara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Michael J HanleyTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-2797
Shining WangTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Pingkuan ZhangTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Karthik VenkatakrishnanMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-9813
Takeda (United States) · USCertara (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib in First Line (ALTA-1L) compared brigatinib versus crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor-naive patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was used to estimate brigatinib exposures for exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses in ALTA-1L. A previously developed population PK model for brigatinib was applied to estimate brigatinib PK parameters. Relationships between static (time-independent) and dynamic (time-varying) exposure metrics and efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS], objective response rate [ORR], and intracranial ORR [iORR]) and safety outcomes (selected grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 adverse events [AEs]) were evaluated using logistic regression and time-to-event analyses. There were no meaningful differences in brigatinib PK in the first-line and second-line settings, supporting use of the previous population PK model for the first-line population. Exposure-response analyses showed no significant effect of time-varying brigatinib exposure on PFS. Brigatinib exposure was not significantly related to ORR, but higher exposure was associated with higher iORR (odds ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.28, p = 0.049). Across the observed median exposure (5th-95th percentile) at steady state for 180 mg once daily, the predicted probability of iORR was 0.83 (0.58-0.99). AEs significantly associated with higher exposure were elevated lipase (grade ≥3) and amylase (grade ≥2). Time to first brigatinib dose reduction was not related to exposure. These results support the benefit-risk profile of first-line brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in dose at 90 mg once daily) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseHumansOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinasebrigatinibOrganophosphorus CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID35041775
PMCPMC9099121
OpenAlexW4206436013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.