Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041690›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Prediction model of acute kidney injury induced by cisplatin in older adults using a machine learning algorithm.

Takaya Okawa, Tomohiro Mizuno, Shogo Hanabusa, Takeshi Ikeda, Fumihiro Mizokami, Takenao Koseki, Kazuo Takahashi, Yukio Yuzawa, Naotake Tsuboi, Shigeki Yamada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takaya OkawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Tomohiro MizunoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-392X
Shogo HanabusaDepartment of Information Engineering, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeshi IkedaDepartment of Information Engineering, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan.
Fumihiro MizokamiDepartment of Pharmacy, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Takenao KosekiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Kazuo TakahashiDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Sciences, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Yukio YuzawaDepartment of Nephrology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Naotake TsuboiDepartment of Nephrology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Shigeki YamadaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Yoshitaka KameyaDepartment of Information Engineering, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPMeijo University · JPNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection and prediction of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (Cis-AKI) are essential for the management of patients on chemotherapy with cisplatin. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a prediction model for Cis-AKI.

methodsJapanese patients, who received cisplatin as the first-line chemotherapy at Fujita Health University Hospital, were enrolled in the study. The main metrics for evaluating the machine learning model were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure. In addition, the rank of contribution as a predictive factor of Cis-AKI was determined by machine learning.

resultsA total of 1,014 and 226 patients were assigned to the development and validation data groups, respectively. The current prediction model showed the highest performance in patients 65 years old and above (AUC: 0.78, accuracy: 0.77, precision: 0.38, recall: 0.70, F-measure: 0.49). The maximum daily cisplatin dose and serum albumin levels contributed the most to the prediction of Cis-AKI.

conclusionOur prediction model for Cis-AKI performed effectively in older patients.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCisplatinMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID35041690
PMCPMC8765666
OpenAlexW4205819672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.