Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041651›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

A deep generative model of 3D single-cell organization.

Rory M Donovan-Maiye, Jackson M Brown, Caleb K Chan, Liya Ding, Calysta Yan, Nathalie Gaudreault, Julie A Theriot, Mary M Maleckar, Theo A Knijnenburg, Gregory R Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Generative models of morphogenesis in developmental biology.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rory M Donovan-MaiyeAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-9771
Jackson M BrownAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2564-0373
Caleb K ChanAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6367-5617
Liya DingAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Calysta YanAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nathalie GaudreaultAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9220-5366
Julie A TheriotAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-2535
Mary M MaleckarAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-3853
Theo A KnijnenburgAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-4222
Gregory R JohnsonAllen Institute for Cell Science, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2985-7732
Allen Institute for Cell Science · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a framework for end-to-end integrative modeling of 3D single-cell multi-channel fluorescent image data of diverse subcellular structures. We employ stacked conditional β-variational autoencoders to first learn a latent representation of cell morphology, and then learn a latent representation of subcellular structure localization which is conditioned on the learned cell morphology. Our model is flexible and can be trained on images of arbitrary subcellular structures and at varying degrees of sparsity and reconstruction fidelity. We train our full model on 3D cell image data and explore design trade-offs in the 2D setting. Once trained, our model can be used to predict plausible locations of structures in cells where these structures were not imaged. The trained model can also be used to quantify the variation in the location of subcellular structures by generating plausible instantiations of each structure in arbitrary cell geometries. We apply our trained model to a small drug perturbation screen to demonstrate its applicability to new data. We show how the latent representations of drugged cells differ from unperturbed cells as expected by on-target effects of the drugs.

Indexed as

Intracellular SpaceModels, BiologicalCell NucleusCells, CulturedCell ShapeComputational BiologyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMicroscopy, FluorescenceSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35041651
PMCPMC8797242
OpenAlexW4205199447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.