ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Longitudinally monitored immune biomarkers predict the timing of COVID-19 outcomes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Clinical Management of COVID-19: A Predictive Model for Unvaccinated Patients Admitted to ICU.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The correlation between red blood cell distribution width to serum albumin ratio and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective study using the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Laboratory findings predictive of critical illness in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Tunisia.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Critical and non-critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients: which is the most predictive biomarker for disease severity and outcome?: A multicentre prospective cohort study comparing mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, inflammatory and immunological patterns.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
- Characterising biological mechanisms underlying ethnicity-associated outcomes in COVID-19 through biomarker trajectories: a multicentre registry analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Dynamical modelling of viral infection and cooperative immune protection in COVID-19 patients.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular and Renal Comorbidities Included into Neural Networks Predict the Outcome in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit: Three-Center, Cross-Validation, Age- and Sex-Matched Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Determining clinical biomarkers to predict long-term SARS-CoV-2 antibody response among COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- SERS-Based Biosensors Combined with Machine Learning for Medical Application.ChemistryOpen · 2023Review
- A simple model of COVID-19 explains disease severity and the effect of treatments.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comment to "Very late intubation in COVID-19 patients: A forgotten prognosis factor?"Critical care (London, England) · 2022Article
- Laboratory Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in COVID-19.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies widely between individuals. Machine learning models can support decision making in healthcare by assessing fatality risk in patients that do not yet show severe signs of COVID-19. Most predictive models rely on static demographic features and clinical values obtained upon hospitalization. However, time-dependent biomarkers associated with COVID-19 severity, such as antibody titers, can substantially contribute to the development of more accurate outcome models. Here we show that models trained on immune biomarkers, longitudinally monitored throughout hospitalization, predicted mortality and were more accurate than models based on demographic and clinical data upon hospital admission. Our best-performing predictive models were based on the temporal analysis of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG titers, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. These biomarkers, together with C-reactive protein and blood urea nitrogen levels, were found to correlate with severity of disease and mortality in a time-dependent manner. Shapley additive explanations of our model revealed the higher predictive value of day post-symptom onset (PSO) as hospitalization progresses and showed how immune biomarkers contribute to predict mortality. In sum, we demonstrate that the kinetics of immune biomarkers can inform clinical models to serve as a powerful monitoring tool for predicting fatality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, underscoring the importance of contextualizing clinical parameters according to their time post-symptom onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.