SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2022
Stereopsis after corneal refractive surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Impact of Refractive and Ocular Residual Astigmatism on Stereopsis After Photorefractive Keratectomy in Patients With Myopic Astigmatism.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Interocular Differences in Corneal Asphericity Are Associated with Stereopsis in Myopic Astigmatism Candidates for Laser Vision Correction.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Contrast Sensitivity and Stereopsis Outcomes Following LASIK Presbyopia Correction Based on the Corneal Aberration Modulation or Corneal Multifocality Induction Methods: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction on binocularity for myopia with glasses-free 3D technique.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus nonimmediate loading in single-implant restorations: An umbrella review.Dental research journal · 2025Review
- Refractive Surgery in Myopic Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo systematically review the published manuscripts on stereopsis after corneal refractive surgery.
methodsThe Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Clinical Key, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles published until August 2020. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the Weighted mean difference (WMD) or Relative risk (RR) and 95% Confidence interval (CI) for postoperative stereopsis changes and incidence when applicable. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders.
resultsSeven studies (1266 eyes) in adults and ten studies in pediatrics (259 eyes) were included. In adults, stereopsis improved significantly compared to the preoperative state (WMD = - 27.4, 95% CI = - 40.0, - 14.7; I
conclusionsStereopsis improves after corneal refractive surgery in adults and pediatrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.