Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041087›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Long-term neurocognitive, psychological, and return to work outcomes in meningioma patients.

Angela Sekely, Konstantine K Zakzanis, Donald Mabbott, Derek S Tsang, Paul Kongkham, Gelareh Zadeh, Kim Edelstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gross-total resection in optic nerve sheath meningiomas: minimally invasive and cosmetic pleasing.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spinal meningiomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Meningiomas with CNS invasion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela SekelyGraduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. angie.sekely@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5823-4294
Konstantine K ZakzanisGraduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Donald MabbottDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Derek S TsangRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul KongkhamDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kim EdelsteinGraduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to investigate long-term neurocognitive, psychological, and return to work (RTW) outcomes in meningioma patients, and to explore whether neurocognitive and psychological factors influence RTW outcomes in this population.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 61 meningioma patients completed in-depth clinical neuropsychological assessments. Of these participants, 42 were of working-age and had RTW information available following neuropsychological assessment. Seventy-one percent and 80% of patients received radiation and surgery, respectively, with 49% receiving both radiation and surgery. Associations between demographic, medical, neurocognitive, psychological, and RTW data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

resultsIn our sample, 68% of patients exhibited global neurocognitive impairment, with the largest effect sizes found on tests of visual memory (d = 0.73), executive function (d = 0.61), and attention (d = 0.54). Twenty-seven percent exhibited moderate to severe levels of depressive symptoms. In addition, 23% and 30% exhibited clinically significant state and trait anxiety, respectively. Forty-eight percent of patients were unable to RTW. Younger age, faster visuomotor processing speed, and, unexpectedly, higher trait anxiety scores were associated with an increased likelihood of returning to work.

conclusionsMeningioma patients are at risk of experiencing neurocognitive deficits, psychological symptoms, and difficulties returning to work. Our results suggest that neurocognitive and psychological factors contribute to RTW status in meningioma patients. Prospective research studies are necessary to increase our understanding of the complexity of functional disability in this growing population.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesReturn to WorkBrain tumorMeningiomaNeurocognitionPsychological symptomsReturn to work

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.