Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041069›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.

Samuel Daly, Jacob T Hanson, Vibha Mavanji, Amy Gravely, James Jean, Alec Jonason, Scott Lewis, James Ashe, John M Looft, Robert A McGovern

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel DalyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 96, Room D-429, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Jacob T HansonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 96, Room D-429, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Vibha MavanjiDivision of Prosthetics, Motion Capture Analysis Laboratory, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Amy GravelyDepartment of Statistics, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
James JeanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 96, Room D-429, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Alec JonasonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 96, Room D-429, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Scott LewisDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
James AsheDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
John M LooftDivision of Prosthetics, Motion Capture Analysis Laboratory, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Robert A McGovernDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 96, Room D-429, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. rmcgover@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-1899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10-20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as "3" demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity (y-intercept). NPH patients scored as "normal" on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.

Indexed as

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureParkinson DiseaseBiomarkersBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansPostural BalanceBiomarkersHydrocephalusPerturbationPostural instabilityReaction timeStep response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.