ArticleExperimental brain research2022
Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presence and origin of variability of the pull test and push-and-release test in people with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Technological Advances for Gait and Balance in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Precision Balance Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: Utilizing Vision-Based 3D Pose Tracking for Pull Test Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Utilizing kinematic analysis of postural instability as an objective measure to aid in distinguishing between normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disease.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Extraction of the pull force from inertial sensors during the pull test for Parkinson's disease: A reliability study.Journal of movement disorders · 2024Article
- Kinematic movement and balance parameter analysis in neurological gait disorders.Journal of biological engineering · 2024Article
- Postural instability in Parkinson's disease assessed with clinical "pull test" and standardized postural perturbations: effect of medication and body weight support.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- TRPV4 mRNA is elevated in the caudate nucleus with NPH but not in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10-20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as "3" demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity (y-intercept). NPH patients scored as "normal" on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35041069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.