Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041066›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Clinical parameters influencing the results of anterior rhinomanometry in children.

Hans J Welkoborsky, Christina Rose-Diekmann, Anja Pähler Vor der Holte, Hagen Ott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Relationships Between Clinical Examination Findings, Subjective Reported Symptoms and Objective Nasal Patency Measures in Nasal Obstruction: A Baseline NAIROS Sub-Study Analysis.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. [Research progress and clinical application of allergen nasal provocation test].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans J WelkoborskyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nordstadt-Clinic, Academic Hospital, Haltenhoffstr. 41, 30167, Hannover, Germany. welkohno.hanno@t-online.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-0903
Christina Rose-DiekmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nordstadt-Clinic, Academic Hospital, Haltenhoffstr. 41, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
Anja Pähler Vor der HolteDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nordstadt-Clinic, Academic Hospital, Haltenhoffstr. 41, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
Hagen OttDepartment of Pediatric Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Academic Hospital, Hannover, Germany.
Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasal obstruction is a frequent symptom in both adults and children and it is a common reason to see an otorhinolaryngologist. Endoscopy of the nasal cavity and the epipharyngeal space along with anterior rhinomanometry is regarded the gold standard since many years to estimate the severity of nasal obstruction in the particular patient. Endoscopy shows anatomical reasons for an obstruction, whereas the nasal flow volume and nasal resistance can be determined using anterior rhinomanometry. Currently, there are only few data available for rhinomanometry results in children. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the application of this technique in the pediatric population for objective evaluation of nasal flow. Whether it achieves reproducible results and which clinical parameters have some influence on the results were studied. PATIENTS AND

methods427 children (average age of 8.5 years, range 7 months through 17 years) who were admitted to evaluate nasal patency or for allergy testing were examined. After clinical examination and endoscopy of the nasal cavity and epipharyngeal space, anterior rhinomanometry was performed before and after application of decongestant nose drops separately for each nose side in 334 children. The nasal flow with a pressure of 150 Pasc was measured and served for statistical evaluation. Flow values were correlated to clinical and endoscopic parameters along with results of allergy tests (prick tests).

resultsReproducible rhinomanometric measurements were possible in children age 3 years and older. However, the standard deviation and variation of measurements were significant in this cohort of patients. Statistically highest significant correlations were found between flow measurements and body height along with the age of the children (p < 0.01) and status following adenoidectomy (p < 0.05). No statistically significant correlations were found between rhinomanometry and results of prick tests.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates that rhinomanometry can be applied in the pediatric population for objective evaluation of nasal obstruction and for determining the effects of decongestant nose drops. The highest correlation was found between nasal flow and children's body height, children's age and status following adenoidectomy. The correlation between nasal flow and clinically/endoscopically determined degree of nasal obstruction was lower. However, definition of normal flow values for particular age groups is challenging since the results showed high variation and standard deviation. Yet with regard to individual patient, the technique achieves reliable results in nasal provocation tests, which are widely used for allergy testing in children. When performed in children it should always be considered that there are age-specific requirements for the examination and interpretation of results in this patient cohort.

Indexed as

HypersensitivityNasal ObstructionAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantNasal DecongestantsNoseRhinomanometryNasal DecongestantsAllergy testAnterior rhinomanometryChildrenNasal obstructionNasal provocation test

Identifiers

PMID35041066
OpenAlexW4205703953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.