Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041058›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus-action priming.

Janine Jargow, Uta Wolfensteller, Christina U Pfeuffer, Hannes Ruge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterising the declarative-procedural transformation in instruction-based learning.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine JargowFaculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany. Janine.jargow@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-0792
Uta WolfenstellerFaculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-8861
Christina U Pfeuffer *Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9394-8316
Hannes Ruge *Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-3859
Technische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 940 / Project A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both active response execution and passive listening to verbal codes (a form of instruction) in single prime trials lead to item-specific repetition priming effects when stimuli re-occur in single probe trials. This holds for task-specific classification (stimulus-classification, SC priming, e.g., apple-small) and action (stimulus-action, SA priming, e.g., apple-right key press). To address the influence of expectation on item-specific SC and SA associations, we tested if item-specific SC and SA priming effects were modulated by the instructed probability of re-encountering individual SC or SA mappings (25% vs. 75% instructed switch probability). Importantly, the experienced item-specific switch probability was always 50%. In Experiment 1 (N = 78), item-specific SA/SC switch  expectations affected SA, but not SC priming effects exclusively following active response execution. Experiment 2 (N = 40) was designed to emphasize SA priming by only including item-specific SC repetitions. This yielded stronger SA priming for 25% vs. 75% expected switch probability, both following response execution as in Experiment 1 and also following verbally coded SA associations. Together, these results suggest that SA priming effects, that is, the encoding and retrieval of SA associations, is modulated by item-specific switch expectation. Importantly, this expectation effect cannot be explained by item-specific associative learning mechanisms, as stimuli were primed and probed only once and participants experienced item-specific repetitions/switches equally often across stimuli independent of instructed switch probabilities. This corroborates and extends previous results by showing that SA priming effects are modulated by  expectation not only based on experienced item-specific switch probabilities, but also on mere instruction.

Indexed as

MotivationRepetition PrimingAuditory PerceptionHumansMotor ActivityProbabilityReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID35041058
PMCPMC9470635
OpenAlexW4205574501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.