Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041047›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract: when and how to use it.

Christian A Gutschow, Christoph Schlag, Diana Vetter

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oesophagopleural fistula after pneumonectomy: A systematic review and case series.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. When helpful becomes harmful: a case-based narrative review of esophageal mesh migration after hiatal hernia repair.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Endoscopic vacuum therapy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian A GutschowDepartment of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. christian.gutschow@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-4427
Christoph SchlagDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Diana VetterDepartment of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a novel treatment option for upper gastrointestinal wall defects. The basic principle of action of EVT entails evacuation of secretions, removal of wound debris, and containment of the defect. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that EVT reduces interstitial edema, increases oxygen saturation, and promotes tissue granulation and microcirculation. Various devices, such as macroporous polyurethane sponge systems or open-pore film drains, have been developed for specific indications. Depending on the individual situation, EVT devices can be placed in- or outside the intestinal lumen, as a stand-alone procedure, or in combination with surgical, radiological, and other endoscopic interventions. PURPOSE: The aim of this narrative review is to describe the current spectrum of EVT in the upper gastrointestinal tract and to assess and summarize the related scientific literature.

conclusionsThere is growing evidence that the efficacy of EVT for upper GI leakages exceeds that of other interventional treatment modalities such as self-expanding metal stents, clips, or simple drainages. Owing to the promising results and the excellent risk profile, EVT has become the therapy of choice for perforations and anastomotic leakages of the upper gastrointestinal tract in many centers of expertise. In addition, recent clinical research suggests that preemptive use of EVT after high-risk upper gastrointestinal resections may play an important role in reducing postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapyUpper Gastrointestinal TractAnastomotic LeakEndoscopyEsophagectomyHumansAnastomotic leakageEndoscopic vacuum therapyEsophageal perforationEsophagectomy; GastrectomyNegative pressure therapy

Identifiers

PMID35041047
PMCPMC9151563
OpenAlexW4205209485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.