Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35041013›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

Effectiveness of supported housing versus residential care in severe mental illness: a multicenter, quasi-experimental study.

Lorenz B Dehn, Thomas Beblo, Dirk Richter, Günther Wienberg, Georg Kremer, Ingmar Steinhart, Martin Driessen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Making a Home for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorenz B DehnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Remterweg 69-71, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany. Lorenz.Dehn@evkb.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9588-7983
Thomas BebloDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Remterweg 69-71, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Dirk RichterCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Bern University Hospital for Mental Health, Bern, Switzerland.
Günther WienbergBethel.regional, Stiftung Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Georg KremerBethel.regional, Stiftung Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ingmar Steinhartvon Bodelschwinghsche Stiftungen Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Martin DriessenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Remterweg 69-71, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEv. Bodelschwing Foundation Bethel · DEUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUp to now there are only few studies and no RCT comparing efficacy or effectiveness of supported housing (SH) versus residential care (RC) in severe mental illness (SMI) without homelessness. Here we present an observational follow-up study in SMI subjects, who entered SH or RC, to compare clinical and functional outcomes 2 years later.

methodsIn this prospective study in more than 30 locations throughout a German federal state, we included SMI subjects, who entered SH (n = 153) or RC (n = 104). About one quarter suffered from each substance use, psychotic, affective, or other disorders. To avoid sampling bias, we used the propensity score matching method to establish a quasi-experimental design. Outcome measures were social functioning (SFS), the number of psychiatric hospitalisations, psychopathology (SCL-9-K), and quality of life (MANSA). Apart from descriptive methods we analysed primarily using repeated-measures ANOVAS.

resultsOur analyses revealed significant effects of time for all outcomes in both study groups. However, there were not any group differences of outcome measures, i.e., not any significant effects of group or interactional effects of group x time. Moreover, these results hold true for intent-to-treat and per-protocol sample analyses.

conclusionThe results show, that SH and RC for non-homeless people with SMI achieve the same clinical and psychosocial outcomes across a 2-year period. Taking into account the users' preferences, the present findings should give reason to ensure the availability of affordable housing and to support the expansion of supported housing approaches.

Indexed as

HousingMental DisordersFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeHealth services, Supported accommodationPsychiatric rehabilitationSocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID35041013
PMCPMC9042980
OpenAlexW4205551064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.