Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040962›Full record

ArticleJournal of AOAC International2022

The Challenge of Measuring Sweet Taste in Food Ingredients and Products for Regulatory Compliance: A Scientific Opinion.

Dustin E Starkey, Zhuzhu Wang, Kommer Brunt, Lise Dreyfuss, Philip A Haselberger, Stephen E Holroyd, Kaushik Janakiraman, Prabhakar Kasturi, Erik J M Konings, David Labbe and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of AOAC International, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Dustin E StarkeyAbbott Nutrition, 3300 Stelzer Rd, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-1978
Zhuzhu WangAbbott Nutrition, 1800 South Oak St, Suite 210 Champaign, IL61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5553-1691
Kommer BruntRotating Disc b.v, Spoorlaan 31, 9753HVHaren, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0991-0364
Lise DreyfussSAM Sensory and Marketing International, 46 rue Armand Carrel, 75019 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-4474
Philip A HaselbergerAbbott Nutrition, 3300 Stelzer Rd, Columbus, OH 43219, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-981X
Stephen E HolroydFonterra Research and Development Centre, Private Bag 11029, Palmerston North4 442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-5995
Kaushik JanakiramanReckitt Health, 60 Radarweg, 1043NT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6294-8225
Prabhakar KasturiPepsiCo R&D, 617, W. Main St, Barrington, IL 60010, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-2607
Erik J M KoningsSociété des Produits Nestlé SA Nestlé Institute of Food Safety and Analytical Sciences, EPFL Innovation Park, Bâtimon G, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-8420
David LabbeSociété des Produits Nestlé SA Nestlé Institute of Material Sciences, Rte du Jorat 57, 1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8213-0583
Marie E LatulippeInstitute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 740 15th St NW, #600, Washington DC 20005, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-9756
Xavier LavigneAbbott Nutrition, Park Lane, Culliganlaan 2B, 1831 Diegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5069-0300
Barry V McClearyEden Rd, Greystones, Murrumburrah, County Wicklow A63YW01, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-5759
Salvatore ParisiLourdes Matha Institute of Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Kuttichal PO, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695574 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7354-4573
Tony ShaoPepsiCo R&D, 617, W. Main St, Barrington, IL 60010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8228-8372
Darryl SullivanEurofins Scientific, N2743 Butternut Rd, Pyonette, WI 53955, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2431-3437
Marina TorresDepartamento de Desarrollo de Métodos Analiticos, Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay LATU, Avenida Italia, 6201 11500 Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-3739
Sudhakar YadlapalliFirstSource Laboratory Solutions LLP (Analytical Services), First Floor, Plot No- A1/B, IDA Nacharam Cross Rd., Hyderabad 500076 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1912-5869
Ioannis VrasidasPurperhoedenveem 94, 1019HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-9451
Abbott (United States) · USNestlé (Switzerland) · CHPepsi (United States) · USAbbott (Belgium) · BEFonterra (New Zealand) · NZLaboratorio Tecnológico del UruguayReckitt Benckiser (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Codex Alimentarius Commission, a central part of the joint Food and Agricultural Organization/World Health Organizations Food Standards Program, adopts internationally recognized standards, guidelines, and code of practices that help ensure safety, quality, and fairness of food trade globally. Although Codex standards are not regulations per se, regulatory authorities around the world may benchmark against these standards or introduce them into regulations within their countries. Recently, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) initiated a draft revision to the Codex standard for follow-up formula (FUF), a drink/product (with added nutrients) for young children, to include requirements for limiting or measuring the amount of sweet taste contributed by carbohydrates in a product. Stakeholders from multiple food and beverage manufacturers expressed concern about the subjectivity of sweetness and challenges with objective measurement for verifying regulatory compliance. It is a requirement that Codex standards include a reference to a suitable method of analysis for verifying compliance with the standard. In response, AOAC INTERNATIONAL formed the Ad Hoc Expert Panel on Sweetness in November 2020 to review human perception of sweet taste, assess the landscape of internationally recognized analytical and sensory methods for measuring sweet taste in food ingredients and products, deliver recommendations to Codex regarding verification of sweet taste requirements for FUF, and develop a scientific opinion on measuring sweet taste in food and beverage products beyond FUF. Findings showed an abundance of official analytical methods for determining quantities of carbohydrates and other sweet-tasting molecules in food products and beverages, but no analytical methods capable of determining sweet taste. Furthermore, sweet taste can be determined by standard sensory analysis methods. However, it is impossible to define a sensory intensity reference value for sweetness, making them unfit to verify regulatory compliance for the purpose of international food trade. Based on these findings and recommendations, the Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling agreed during its 41st session in May 2021 to inform CCNFSDU that there are no known validated methods to measure sweetness of carbohydrate sources; therefore, no way to determine compliance for such a requirement for FUF.

Indexed as

Food IngredientsBeveragesDietFood, FormulatedHumansTasteFood Ingredients

Identifiers

PMID35040962
PMCPMC8924649
OpenAlexW4206582312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.