Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040886›Full record

ArticleJAMA2022

Trends in US Ambulatory Care Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2019-2021.

John N Mafi, Melody Craff, Sitaram Vangala, Thomas Pu, Dale Skinner, Cyrus Tabatabai-Yazdi, Anikia Nelson, Rachel Reid, Denis Agniel, Chi-Hong Tseng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Individual-Level Trends in Mammography Screening over 14 years: Results from an All-Payer Statewide Claims Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Changes in Trends of Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Because of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John N MafiDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Melody CraffMilliman MedInsight, Seattle, Washington.
Sitaram VangalaDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Thomas PuMilliman MedInsight, Seattle, Washington.
Dale SkinnerMilliman MedInsight, Seattle, Washington.
Cyrus Tabatabai-YazdiSchool of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
Anikia NelsonMilliman MedInsight, Seattle, Washington.
Rachel ReidRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Denis AgnielRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Chi-Hong TsengDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Catherine SarkisianDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Cheryl L DambergRAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Katherine L KahnDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

Identifying Approaches to Measure and Reduce Harmful, Low-Value Care Among Older Americans with Mild Cognitive Impairment and DementiaR01AG070017 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAFI, JOHN N. · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Midcareer Award in Patient-Oriented Community-Academic Partnered Aging ResearchK24AG047899 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SARKISIAN, CATHERINE A · 2014 to 2025
$2.0M
Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Measure and Reduce Harmful, Low-Value Care Among Older AdultsK76AG064392 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAFI, JOHN · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG047899NIA NIH HHS K76 AG064392NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Following reductions in US ambulatory care early in the pandemic, it remains unclear whether care consistently returned to expected rates across insurance types and services. Objective: To assess whether patients with Medicaid or Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility had significantly lower than expected return to use of ambulatory care rates than patients with commercial, Medicare Advantage, or Medicare fee-for-service insurance. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study examining ambulatory care service patterns from January 1, 2019, through February 28, 2021, claims data from multiple US payers were combined using the Milliman MedInsight research database. Using a difference-in-differences design, the extent to which utilization during the pandemic differed from expected rates had the pandemic not occurred was estimated. Changes in utilization rates between January and February 2020 and each subsequent 2-month time frame during the pandemic were compared with the changes in the corresponding months from the year prior. Age- and sex-adjusted Poisson regression models of monthly utilization counts were used, offsetting for total patient-months and stratifying by service and insurance type. Exposures: Patients with Medicaid or Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility compared with patients with commercial, Medicare Advantage, or Medicare fee-for-service insurance, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Utilization rates per 100 people for 6 services: emergency department, office and urgent care, behavioral health, screening colonoscopies, screening mammograms, and contraception counseling or HIV screening. Results: More than 14.5 million US adults were included (mean age, 52.7 years; 54.9% women). In the March-April 2020 time frame, the combined use of 6 ambulatory services declined to 67.0% (95% CI, 66.9%-67.1%) of expected rates, but returned to 96.7% (95% CI, 96.6%-96.8%) of expected rates by the November-December 2020 time frame. During the second COVID-19 wave in the January-February 2021 time frame, overall utilization again declined to 86.2% (95% CI, 86.1%-86.3%) of expected rates, with colonoscopy remaining at 65.0% (95% CI, 64.1%-65.9%) and mammography at 79.2% (95% CI, 78.5%-79.8%) of expected rates. By the January-February 2021 time frame, overall utilization returned to expected rates as follows: patients with Medicaid at 78.4% (95% CI, 78.2%-78.7%), Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility at 73.3% (95% CI, 72.8%-73.8%), commercial at 90.7% (95% CI, 90.5%-90.9%), Medicare Advantage at 83.2% (95% CI, 81.7%-82.2%), and Medicare fee-for-service at 82.0% (95% CI, 81.7%-82.2%; P < .001; comparing return to expected utilization rates among patients with Medicaid and Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, respectively, with each of the other insurance types). Conclusions and Relevance: Between March 2020 and February 2021, aggregate use of 6 ambulatory care services increased after the preceding decrease in utilization that followed the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the rate of increase in use of these ambulatory care services was significantly lower for participants with Medicaid or Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility than for those insured by commercial, Medicare Advantage, or Medicare fee-for-service.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareColonoscopyCOVID-19Databases, FactualFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMammographyMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID35040886
PMCPMC8767442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.