Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040804›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2022

Introducing Long-Acting Contraceptive Removal Indicators in a Pilot Study in Mozambique: Dynamics of Discontinuation and Implications for Quality of Care.

Ana Jacinto, Adalgisa Viola Ronda, Connie Lee, Fariyal F Fikree, Eric Ramirez-Ferrero

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana JacintoPathfinder International, Maputo, Mozambique.
Adalgisa Viola RondaPathfinder International, Maputo, Mozambique.
Connie LeePathfinder International, Washington, DC, USA. clee@pathfinder.org.
Fariyal F FikreeConsultant, Washington, DC, USA.
Eric Ramirez-FerreroMOMENTUM Integrated Health Resilience Project, Corus International, Washington, DC, USA; formerly of Pathfinder International, Washington, DC, USA.
Pathfinder International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe recent increase in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) will result in an equal increase in the need for removals. Few countries monitor the number of LARC removals and even fewer track reasons for removal, discontinuation, and method switching. We conducted a mixed-method study to pilot the introduction of 5 LARC removal indicators in Mozambique: (1) reason for seeking removal, (2) duration of use, (3) removal outcome, (4) reason for referral, and (5) family planning (FP) outcome. We assessed providers' perceptions about the feasibility and utility of tracking these indicators and reviewed the findings to ascertain the quality-of-care concerns.

methodsWe used a purposive, multistage sampling technique to select 19 intervention facilities in Nampula and Sofala provinces. Over 6 months, we abstracted data on the 5 indicators from an FP register addendum to determine when and why clients seek LARC removals and identify service quality issues that need to be addressed in the FP program. We used a supportive supervision checklist to assess the time taken to record data on the indicators and perceived benefits and challenges encountered by providers during record keeping.

resultsOf the 795 clients who sought a LARC removal, 112 women (14.1%) opted not to have the removal after counseling. The most frequently reported reasons for seeking a removal were: the method was on-schedule for removal or past its expiration date (29.5%), complaints of side effects (25.8%), and desire to be pregnant (22.9%). Health care providers reported no major challenges in recording information in the addendum. Reasons for and timing of removal pointed to the need for strengthening FP counseling.

conclusionCollecting, synthesizing, and interpreting data from the LARC removal indicators was feasible and provided valuable insights to improve the quality of care to enhance clients' reproductive health care and contraceptive choices.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMozambiquePilot ProjectsPregnancyContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35040804
PMCPMC8885348
OpenAlexW4205538278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.