ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2022
Introducing Long-Acting Contraceptive Removal Indicators in a Pilot Study in Mozambique: Dynamics of Discontinuation and Implications for Quality of Care.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Among Adolescent Women in 55 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Demography · 2025Article
- Keeping the "R" in LARC (long-acting reversible contraception): Measuring client-centered implant removal services in sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.Studies in family planning · 2024Article
- Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.Studies in family planning · 2024Article
- Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.Studies in family planning · 2024Article
- Mobilizing stakeholders for implant removals in Burkina Faso using landscape assessment data.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- What is needed to improve quality of implant removal services in Nigeria? results of a landscape assessment.Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe recent increase in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) will result in an equal increase in the need for removals. Few countries monitor the number of LARC removals and even fewer track reasons for removal, discontinuation, and method switching. We conducted a mixed-method study to pilot the introduction of 5 LARC removal indicators in Mozambique: (1) reason for seeking removal, (2) duration of use, (3) removal outcome, (4) reason for referral, and (5) family planning (FP) outcome. We assessed providers' perceptions about the feasibility and utility of tracking these indicators and reviewed the findings to ascertain the quality-of-care concerns.
methodsWe used a purposive, multistage sampling technique to select 19 intervention facilities in Nampula and Sofala provinces. Over 6 months, we abstracted data on the 5 indicators from an FP register addendum to determine when and why clients seek LARC removals and identify service quality issues that need to be addressed in the FP program. We used a supportive supervision checklist to assess the time taken to record data on the indicators and perceived benefits and challenges encountered by providers during record keeping.
resultsOf the 795 clients who sought a LARC removal, 112 women (14.1%) opted not to have the removal after counseling. The most frequently reported reasons for seeking a removal were: the method was on-schedule for removal or past its expiration date (29.5%), complaints of side effects (25.8%), and desire to be pregnant (22.9%). Health care providers reported no major challenges in recording information in the addendum. Reasons for and timing of removal pointed to the need for strengthening FP counseling.
conclusionCollecting, synthesizing, and interpreting data from the LARC removal indicators was feasible and provided valuable insights to improve the quality of care to enhance clients' reproductive health care and contraceptive choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.