Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040792›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Using Biological Feedback to Promote Health Behavior Change in Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Kelli M Richardson, Ahlam A Saleh, Michelle R Jospe, Yue Liao, Susan M Schembre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging continuous glucose monitoring as a catalyst for behaviour change: a scoping review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelli M RichardsonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-252X
Ahlam A SalehArizona Health Sciences Library, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-3140
Michelle R JospeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-5517
Yue LiaoDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-336X
Susan M SchembreDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-7136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany health conditions can be prevented, managed, or improved through behavioral interventions. As a component of health behavior change interventions, biological feedback is of particular interest given recent advances in wearable biosensing technology, digital health apps, and personalized health and wellness. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of literature to guide the design and implementation of interventions that incorporate biological feedback to motivate health behavior change.

objectiveThe goal of this scoping review is to deeply explore the use of biological feedback as a component of health behavior change interventions that target adults. The objectives of the review include (1) mapping the domains of research that incorporate biological feedback and (2) describing the operational characteristics of using biological feedback in the context of health behavior change.

methodsA comprehensive list of search terms was developed to capture studies from a wide range of domains. The studies to be included are randomized controlled trials published as primary research articles, theses, or dissertations targeting adults 18 years and older, who use biological feedback to change a health-related behavior. The following electronic databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. The screening and data extraction process will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and conducted by trained reviewers.

resultsDatabase searches were completed in June 2021. A total of 50,459 unique records were returned after the removal of 48,634 duplicate records. The scoping review is planned for completion in 2022.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to map the literature that uses biological feedback as a component of health behavior change interventions targeting adults. The findings will be used to develop a framework to guide the design and implementation of future health behavior change interventions that incorporate biological feedback.

trial registrationOSF Registries OSF.IO/YP5WA; https://osf.io/yp5wa. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/32579.

Indexed as

biofeedbackbiomarkersfeedbackhealth behaviorhealth databaseshealth interventionshealth promotionmonitoringphysiologicpsychological

Identifiers

PMID35040792
PMCPMC8808341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.