Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040757›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2022

A Content Analysis of Cannabis Company Adherence to Marketing Requirements in Four States.

Megan A Moreno, Marina Jenkins, Kole Binger, Lauren Kelly, Pamela J Trangenstein, Jennifer M Whitehill, David H Jernigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence Approximates Human Affect Ratings of Cannabis Images.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Examining indirect effects of advertising exposure on young adults' cannabis and nicotine vaping.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan A MorenoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Marina JenkinsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Kole BingerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lauren KellyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Pamela J TrangensteinGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jennifer M WhitehillUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
David H JerniganDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Marijuana ads in traditional and social media: Influence and policy implicationsR01DA041641 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MORENO, MEGAN A. · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMarketing messages can influence adolescents' attitudes and behaviors toward alcohol and tobacco. In the era of legalized cannabis use, retail cannabis companies often use social media marketing on platforms popular among youth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate adherence to state-based regulations for restricted and required content across social media from recreational cannabis businesses.

methodA retrospective content analysis was used to evaluate one year of publicly displayed posts by retail cannabis companies on Facebook and Instagram from four states in which recreational cannabis use is legal (Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington State). We evaluated restricted content including the following: (a) business practices, such as avoiding discounts/promotions or promoting branded products; (b) modeling cannabis use or overconsumption; (c) youth-focused messaging; and (d) health benefits. We evaluated required content including three types of warnings: (a) limiting cannabis use to those age 21 and over, (b) avoiding impaired driving, and (c) describing health risks.

resultsA total of 2,660 posts were evaluated from 14 businesses. In the area of restricted content, discounts/promotions were present in approximately 35% of all posts. Another common category was overconsumption, found in 12% of posts. Required content regarding warnings was present in less than half of all social media posts.

conclusionsDespite state-based advertising restrictions, recreational cannabis business pages use messages with youth appeal. Required safety message adherence is not typical on social media business pages.

Indexed as

CannabisSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAdvertisingHumansMarketingRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35040757
PMCPMC8819899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.