SynthesisYonsei medical journal2022
Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Cardiovascular-Related Diseases from Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Yonsei medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study for the Improvement of a Digital Health Platform for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure
Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial for the Validation of Vitalera Platform
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram signals for sudden cardiac death prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Continuous Movement Monitoring at Home Through Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- The role of cardiac acoustic biomarkers in monitoring patients with heart failure: A systematic literature review.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Mobile Health Intervention in Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- Identification of atrial fibrillation using heart rate variability: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Real-World Accuracy of Wearable Activity Trackers for Detecting Medical Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation from ECGs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evolution of Risk Measurement Techniques and Assessment of Their Effectiveness (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted CTA for the assessment of atherosclerosis plaque: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Smart Wearables for the Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Accuracy and Systematic Biases of Heart Rate Measurements by Consumer-Grade Fitness Trackers in Postoperative Patients: Prospective Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Voice-assisted artificial intelligence in cardiovascular disease management: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Technologies in the Context of Cardiovascular Prevention From Early Detection to Cardiac Recovery: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Flexible wearable medical devices: from material innovations and data processing to intelligent healthcare applications.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology in the current era: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Digital Health-Optimized Therapeutics for the Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: prevention, diagnosis, and intervention.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Risk Assessment Approaches for Implantable Defibrillator Therapy to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSeveral artificial intelligence (AI) models for the detection and prediction of cardiovascular-related diseases, including arrhythmias, diabetes, and sleep apnea, have been reported. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify AI models developed for or applicable to wearable and mobile devices for diverse cardiovascular-related diseases. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe searched databases included Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. For AI models for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection, a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed to summarize sensitivity and specificity.
resultsA total of 102 studies were included in the qualitative review. There were AI models for the detection of arrythmia (n=62), followed by sleep apnea (n=11), peripheral vascular diseases (n=6), diabetes mellitus (n=5), hyper/hypotension (n=5), valvular heart disease (n=4), heart failure (n=3), myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest (n=2), and others (n=4). For quantitative analysis of 26 studies reporting AI models for AF detection, meta-analyzed sensitivity was 94.80% and specificity was 96.96%. Deep neural networks showed superior performance [meta-analyzed area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.981] compared to conventional machine learning algorithms (meta-analyzed AUROC of 0.961). However, AI models tested with proprietary dataset (meta-analyzed AUROC of 0.972) or data acquired from wearable devices (meta-analyzed AUROC of 0.977) showed inferior performance than those with public dataset (meta-analyzed AUROC of 0.986) or data from in-hospital devices (meta-analyzed AUROC of 0.983).
conclusionThis review found that AI models for diverse cardiovascular-related diseases are being developed, and that they are gradually developing into a form that is suitable for wearable and mobile devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.