Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040480›Full record

ArticleDemography2022

Modeling Age Patterns of Under-5 Mortality: Results From a Log-Quadratic Model Applied to High-Quality Vital Registration Data.

Michel Guillot, Julio Romero Prieto, Andrea Verhulst, Patrick Gerland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maternally derived antibody titer dynamics and risk of hospitalized infant dengue disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michel GuillotPopulation Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5142-6835
Julio Romero PrietoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8131-7821
Andrea VerhulstUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-1330
Patrick GerlandUnited Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2082-3122

Funding

Global Age Patterns of Under-Five MortalityR01HD090082 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUILLOT, MICHEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information about how the risk of death varies with age within the 0-5 age range represents critical evidence for guiding health policy. This study proposes a new model for summarizing regularities about how under-5 mortality is distributed by detailed age. The model is based on a newly compiled database that contains under-5 mortality information by detailed age in countries with high-quality vital registration systems, covering a wide array of mortality levels and patterns. It uses a log-quadratic approach in predicting a full mortality schedule between ages 0 and 5 on the basis of only one or two parameters. With its larger number of age-groups, the proposed model offers greater flexibility than existing models in terms of both entry parameters and model outcomes. We present applications of this model for evaluating and correcting under-5 mortality information by detailed age in countries with problematic mortality data.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyMortalityChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualData CollectionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAge patterns of mortalityIndirect methodsModel life tablesNeonatal mortalityUnder-5 mortality

Identifiers

PMID35040480
PMCPMC8941647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.