Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040432›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Genetic basis and dual adaptive role of floral pigmentation in sunflowers.

Marco Todesco, Natalia Bercovich, Amy Kim, Ivana Imerovski, Gregory L Owens, Óscar Dorado Ruiz, Srinidhi V Holalu, Lufiani L Madilao, Mojtaba Jahani, Jean-Sébastien Légaré and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. FePlant, cell & environment · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A single nucleotide mutation ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco TodescoDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-4096
Natalia BercovichDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-2858
Amy KimDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2623-4118
Ivana ImerovskiDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-3664
Gregory L OwensDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-5215
Óscar Dorado RuizDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Srinidhi V HolaluDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1948-8216
Lufiani L MadilaoMichael Smith Laboratory and Wine Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-2540
Mojtaba JahaniDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-1464
Jean-Sébastien LégaréDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1483-9643
Benjamin K BlackmanDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4936-6153
Loren H RiesebergDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-2417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in floral displays, both between and within species, has been long known to be shaped by the mutualistic interactions that plants establish with their pollinators. However, increasing evidence suggests that abiotic selection pressures influence floral diversity as well. Here, we analyse the genetic and environmental factors that underlie patterns of floral pigmentation in wild sunflowers. While sunflower inflorescences appear invariably yellow to the human eye, they display extreme diversity for patterns of ultraviolet pigmentation, which are visible to most pollinators. We show that this diversity is largely controlled by

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalUltraviolet RaysFlavonolsHelianthusPhenotypePigmentationPollinationFlavonolsabiotic stressadaptationevolutionary biologyfloral pigmentationgeneticsgenomicspollinationsunflowersunflower (helianthus annuus)transcription factors

Identifiers

PMID35040432
PMCPMC8765750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.