ArticleMuscle & nerve2022
Clinical course and outcome of an outpatient clinic population with myasthenia gravis and COVID-19.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in hospitalisation, myasthenic crisis and intensive care use in myasthenia gravis: a nationwide population-based study in Spain (2016-2022).Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Who Can Safely Discontinue Treatment in Myasthenia Gravis? Insights From a Long-Term Real-World Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Predictors of exacerbation in myasthenia gravis after minimal symptom expression: a bicenter cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors for Poor Outcomes Associated with COVID-19 in a Retrospective Cohort of Myasthenia Gravis Patients.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Choices and Challenges With Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine three-dose safety and risk of COVID-19 in patients with myasthenia gravis during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Clinical course and outcome of an outpatient clinic population with myasthenia gravis and COVID-19.Muscle & nerve · 2022Article
- Factors affecting the intention of COVID-19 vaccination in Korean patients with myasthenia gravis: A survey-based study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Case Report: Functional Outcome of COVID-19 Subjects With Myasthenia Gravis and Critical Illness Polyneuropathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsCoronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) may have a more severe course in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). We aimed to assess severity of the infection and factors contributing to its severity in a group of MG patients, most of whom were not hospitalized.
methodsOne hundred forty outpatients with MG followed between March 2020 and April 2021 were included in our study. Patients were asked to respond to a brief questionnaire in person, by telemedicine, or through electronic messages.
resultsNineteen patients tested positive for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction. Two were asymptomatic. Of the 17 symptomatic patients, 11 had mild symptoms. They either had no treatment or received antivirals, antibiotics, and anticoagulants. Their myasthenia was well-controlled before infection and was unaffected by COVID-19. Three patients with moderate COVID-19 required hospitalization, but not intensive care, and had full recovery. Three other patients, the oldest in the cohort, had severe disease: One patient with a postsurgery myasthenic exacerbation before the infection needed intensive care without intubation, but recovered completely; two morbidly obese patients with comorbidities required intubation and died. Corticosteroids were increased in four of the six moderate/severely affected patients. Immunosuppressive (IS) agents were generally continued. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID-19 was used in one patient. DISCUSSION: Most patients had mild COVID-19 and all but two patients recovered. The design of the study made it possible to capture mild cases. Having well-controlled MG before infection and absence of comorbidities likely affected the course of the infection favorably. IS did not influence the progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.