Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35040101›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ultrasound2022

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review.

Francesco Pegoraro, Giulia Giusti, Martina Giacalone, Niccolò Parri

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Optimized imaging for suspected acute organ bleeding].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Management of Pediatric Solid Organ Injuries.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Establishing the international research priorities for pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: A modified Delphi study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco PegoraroDepartment of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia GiustiDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Martina GiacaloneDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò ParriDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy. niccolo.parri@meyer.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-2504
Meyer Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntra-abdominal injury is a major cause of morbidity in children. Computed tomography (CT) is the reference standard for the evaluation of hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma. CT has an increased risk of long-term radiation induced malignancies and a possible risk associated with the use of iodinated contrast media. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) might represent an alternative to CT in stable children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Nonetheless, CEUS in pediatrics remains limited by the lack of strong evidence. The purpose of this study was to offer a systematic review on the use of CEUS in pediatric abdominal trauma.

methodsElectronic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases of studies investigating CEUS for abdominal trauma in children. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

resultsThis systematic review included 7 studies. CEUS was performed with different ultrasound equipment, always with a curvilinear transducer. Six out of seven studies used a second-generation contrast agent. No immediate adverse reactions were reported. The dose of contrast agent and the scanning technique varied between studies. All CEUS exams were performed by radiologists, in the radiology department or at the bedside. No standard training was reported to become competent in CEUS. The range of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 85.7 to 100% and 89 to 100%, respectively.

conclusionCEUS appears to be safe and accurate to identify abdominal solid organ injuries in children with BAT. Further research is necessary to assess the feasibility of CEUS by non-radiologists, the necessary training, and the benefit-cost ratio of CEUS as a tool to potentially reduce CT scans.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingChildContrast MediaHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyContrast MediaAbdominal traumaChildrenContrast-enhanced ultrasoundUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35040101
PMCPMC9402848
OpenAlexW4205789207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.